MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/rcs.1448

Медицинская библиотека · The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2012

Robotic-assisted treatment of celiac artery compression syndrome: report of a case and review of the literature.

Meyer Mark, Gharagozloo Farid, Nguyen Duy, Tempesta Barbara, Strother Eric, Margolis Marc

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The surgical management of celiac artery compression syndrome (CACS) is controversial. Controversies include the appropriate surgical technique, the surgical approach, and the utility of postoperative stents. The literature is reviewed, and a case of CACS is presented in which a robotic-assisted division of the median arcuate ligament (MAL) was performed.

METHODS

Robotic-assisted treatment of celiac artery syndrome was carried out using six (five 1 cm and one 2 cm) abdominal incisions. The robotic device was used to expose the aorta and celiac artery and divide the median arcuate ligament.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the patient's postprandial abdominal pain subsided. On 16 month follow-up, the patient was doing well, tolerated an unrestricted diet without symptoms, and exhibited weight gain.

CONCLUSION

This case is the second reported in the literature and demonstrates that the robotic approach to division of the MAL is feasible, safe, and efficacious.

Для цитирования: Meyer Mark, Gharagozloo Farid, Nguyen Duy, Tempesta Barbara, Strother Eric, Margolis Marc. Robotic-assisted treatment of celiac artery compression syndrome: report of a case and review of the literature.. The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS. 2012. DOI: 10.1002/rcs.1448.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.