A Clinical Evaluation of Cone-beam Computed Tomography: Implications for Endodontic Microsurgery.

INTRODUCTION

Cone-beam computed tomographic (CBCT) imaging is a valuable diagnostic tool for endodontics. Some studies report that CBCT images have limitations in representing the true clinical presentation. This prospective, in vivo study compared limited field of view (LFOV) CBCT measurements with clinical measurements made during endodontic surgery.

METHODS

Eighty-seven subjects requiring endodontic surgery and LFOV CBCT acquisition of the surgical site were enrolled. Data collection involved clinicians answering standardized questions during the radiographic and surgical assessment. Intraoperatively, data were collected and photographically documented. Postoperatively, CBCT scans were evaluated by 3 calibrated, board-certified specialists: 2 endodontists and 1 oral and maxillofacial radiologist. The 2 subsets of data were compared through statistical analysis to quantify their relationship.

RESULTS

The subjects included 65 maxillary and 29 mandibular teeth from 87 subjects: 25 women and 62 men with an average age of 42 years old. The CBCT evaluators correctly identified the presence or absence of buccal plate fenestrations with 91.0% accuracy (95% confidence interval, 83.1-96.0) with 89.4% sensitivity and 92.9% specificity. The area of fenestrations measured clinically (mean = 19.6 ± 33.4 mm2) was generally larger than the area measured by CBCT imaging (mean across CBCT evaluators = 12.2 ± 19.1 mm2). Fenestration size in the maxillary arch was more likely to be underestimated than in the mandibular arch (P < .0001). Vertical bone height was also underestimated when measured on CBCT imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this study, LFOV CBCT imaging accurately identifies the presence or absence of buccal plate fenestrations, yet, when a fenestration is present, underestimates its area.