MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.040

Медицинская библиотека · Injury · 2021

Biomechanical comparison of different cerclage types in addition to an angle stable plate osteosynthesis of distal tibial fractures.

Förch Stefan, Sandriesser Sabrina, Mayr Edgar, Schrödl Falk, von Rüden Christian, Augat Peter

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Different stand-alone cerclage configurations and their optimal twisting techniques have been investigated over the years. This study tests for the stabilizing effect of different supplemental cerclage materials in combination with locked plating of distal tibia fractures.

METHODS

Locking plate fixation of a distal tibial spiral fracture was tested as stand-alone and with supplemental cerclage materials (one cable, two cables, wire, fiber tape). Construct stiffness and fracture gap movements were investigated under quasi-static and dynamic loads and compared to the stand-alone locking plate.

RESULTS

With each of the tested cerclages, stiffness was significantly higher than for a solitary plate osteosynthesis. Most reduction in fracture gap movement was achieved by cable cerclages, followed by double-looped wire and double-looped fiber tape cerclages. Under dynamic loading an additional cable cerclage reduces excessive gap movement.

CONCLUSION

Compared to solitary plate osteosynthesis all supplemental cerclage materials were generally superior with reduced fracture gap movements whereas cable cerclages showing the greatest stabilizing effect.

Для цитирования: Förch Stefan, Sandriesser Sabrina, Mayr Edgar, Schrödl Falk, von Rüden Christian, Augat Peter. Biomechanical comparison of different cerclage types in addition to an angle stable plate osteosynthesis of distal tibial fractures.. Injury. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.040.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.