Cardiovascular research · 2018
P2Y12 antagonists and cardiac repair post-myocardial infarction: global and regional heart function analysis and molecular assessments in pigs.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vilahur Gemma, Gutiérrez Manuel, Casani Laura, Lambert Carmen, Mendieta Guiomar, Ben-Aicha Soumaya, Capdevila Antoni, Pons-Lladó Guillem, Carreras Francesc, Carlsson Leif, Hidalgo Alberto, Badimon Lina
Аннотация
AIMS: P2Y12 antagonists are the standard in antiplatelet therapy but their potential effects on functional myocardial recovery and cardioprotection post-myocardial infarction (MI) are unknown. We investigated in a preclinical model of MI whether ticagrelor and clopidogrel differently affect cardiac repair post-MI.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Pigs either received: (i) clopidogrel (600 mg; 75 mg/qd); (ii) ticagrelor (180 mg; 90 mg/bid); and (iii) placebo control. MI was induced by mid-left anterior descending coronary artery balloon occlusion (60 min) and animals received the maintenance doses for the following 42 days. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance was performed at Day 3 and Day 42 for the assessment of global and regional cardiac parameters. We determined cardiac AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Akt/PKB, aquaporin-4, vascular density, and fibrosis. In comparison to controls, both P2Y12 antagonists limited infarct expansion at Day 3, although ticagrelor induced a further 5% reduction (P < 0.05 vs. clopidogrel) whereas oedema was only reduced by ticagrelor (≈23% P < 0.05). Scar size decreased at Day 42 in ticagrelor-treated pigs vs. controls but not in clopidogrel-treated pigs. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher 3 days post-MI in ticagrelor-treated pigs and persisted up to Day 42 (P < 0.05 vs. post-MI). Regional analysis revealed that control and clopidogrel-treated pigs had severe and extensive wall motion abnormalities in the jeopardized myocardium and a reduced myocardial viability that was not as evident in ticagrelor-treated pigs (χ2P < 0.05 vs. ticagrelor). Only ticagrelor enhanced myocardial AMPK and Akt/PKB activation and reduced aquaporin-4 levels (P < 0.05 vs. control and clopidogrel). No differences were observed in vessel density and fibrosis markers among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor is more efficient than clopidogrel in attenuating myocardial structural and functional alterations post-MI and in improving cardiac healing. These benefits are associated with persistent AMPK and Akt/PKB activation.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Pigs either received: (i) clopidogrel (600 mg; 75 mg/qd); (ii) ticagrelor (180 mg; 90 mg/bid); and (iii) placebo control. MI was induced by mid-left anterior descending coronary artery balloon occlusion (60 min) and animals received the maintenance doses for the following 42 days. Serial cardiac magnetic resonance was performed at Day 3 and Day 42 for the assessment of global and regional cardiac parameters. We determined cardiac AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), Akt/PKB, aquaporin-4, vascular density, and fibrosis. In comparison to controls, both P2Y12 antagonists limited infarct expansion at Day 3, although ticagrelor induced a further 5% reduction (P < 0.05 vs. clopidogrel) whereas oedema was only reduced by ticagrelor (≈23% P < 0.05). Scar size decreased at Day 42 in ticagrelor-treated pigs vs. controls but not in clopidogrel-treated pigs. Left ventricular ejection fraction was higher 3 days post-MI in ticagrelor-treated pigs and persisted up to Day 42 (P < 0.05 vs. post-MI). Regional analysis revealed that control and clopidogrel-treated pigs had severe and extensive wall motion abnormalities in the jeopardized myocardium and a reduced myocardial viability that was not as evident in ticagrelor-treated pigs (χ2P < 0.05 vs. ticagrelor). Only ticagrelor enhanced myocardial AMPK and Akt/PKB activation and reduced aquaporin-4 levels (P < 0.05 vs. control and clopidogrel). No differences were observed in vessel density and fibrosis markers among groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Ticagrelor is more efficient than clopidogrel in attenuating myocardial structural and functional alterations post-MI and in improving cardiac healing. These benefits are associated with persistent AMPK and Akt/PKB activation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AMP-Activated Protein KinasesAnimalsClopidogrelDisease Models, AnimalEchocardiographyFibrosisHeart VentriclesMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMyocardial InfarctionMyocytes, CardiacProto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsReceptors, Purinergic P2Receptors, Purinergic P2Y12Signal TransductionStroke VolumeSus scrofaTicagrelorTime FactorsVentricular Function, LeftVentricular Remodeling