Journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2016
Current Opinions on Fracture Follow-up: A Survey of OTA Members Regarding Standards of Care and Implications for Clinical Research.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ricci William M, Black James C, Tornetta Paul, Gardner Michael J, McAndrew Christopher M, Sanders Roy W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To determine current practice standards among Orthopaedic Trauma Association surgeons for postoperative fracture follow-up and to investigate the implications of these standards on clinical research.
DESIGN: Survey.
SETTING: Web-based survey.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-four orthopaedic trauma surgeons.
METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to Orthopaedic Trauma Association members to identify standard postoperative radiographic and clinical follow-up duration. Assuming uneventful, complete fracture healing at 3 months, data were collected for 3 generic fracture types (diaphyseal, extra-articular metaphyseal, and intra-articular) and 3 specific fractures (femoral shaft, intertrochanteric, and tibial plateau). Suggested follow-up for clinical research was also investigated.
RESULTS: For extra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up were considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 70% of respondents. For intra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up was considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 39% of respondents. The most common responses for radiographic follow-up were 3 months for extra-articular fractures (33%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (34%). The most common responses for clinical follow-up were 6 months for extra-articular fractures (37%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (35%). The majority (55%) indicated that follow-up to clinical and radiographic healing or the establishment of a nonunion should be the minimum follow-up for clinical fracture studies and 66% recommended follow-up to at least 1 year for functional outcome studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons follow-up patients with lower extremity extra-articular fractures (with uneventful healing) radiographically for 3-6 months and clinically for 6 months and slightly longer for intra-articular fractures. Many surgeons cease radiographic and clinical follow-up by 6 months. Therefore, retrospective fracture healing studies can only reasonably expect follow-up for 6 months. Publication requirements for longer follow-up of fracture-related studies would likely eliminated retrospective studies from consideration. Most surgeons support obtaining at least 1-year follow-up for clinical studies that include functional outcome.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
DESIGN: Survey.
SETTING: Web-based survey.
PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eighty-four orthopaedic trauma surgeons.
METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was distributed to Orthopaedic Trauma Association members to identify standard postoperative radiographic and clinical follow-up duration. Assuming uneventful, complete fracture healing at 3 months, data were collected for 3 generic fracture types (diaphyseal, extra-articular metaphyseal, and intra-articular) and 3 specific fractures (femoral shaft, intertrochanteric, and tibial plateau). Suggested follow-up for clinical research was also investigated.
RESULTS: For extra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up were considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 70% of respondents. For intra-articular fractures, standard radiographic and clinical follow-up was considered to be 6 months or less by greater than 39% of respondents. The most common responses for radiographic follow-up were 3 months for extra-articular fractures (33%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (34%). The most common responses for clinical follow-up were 6 months for extra-articular fractures (37%) and 12 months for intra-articular fractures (35%). The majority (55%) indicated that follow-up to clinical and radiographic healing or the establishment of a nonunion should be the minimum follow-up for clinical fracture studies and 66% recommended follow-up to at least 1 year for functional outcome studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Most surgeons follow-up patients with lower extremity extra-articular fractures (with uneventful healing) radiographically for 3-6 months and clinically for 6 months and slightly longer for intra-articular fractures. Many surgeons cease radiographic and clinical follow-up by 6 months. Therefore, retrospective fracture healing studies can only reasonably expect follow-up for 6 months. Publication requirements for longer follow-up of fracture-related studies would likely eliminated retrospective studies from consideration. Most surgeons support obtaining at least 1-year follow-up for clinical studies that include functional outcome.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level V. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.