Journal of endodontics · 2021
Influence of Progressive Versus Minimal Canal Preparations on the Fracture Resistance of Mandibular Molars: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Smoljan Michael, Hussein Mostafa Omran, Guentsch Arndt, Ibrahim Mohamed
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: This study compared the residual tooth strength and stress distribution of a mandibular molar prepared with different variable tapered file systems using finite element analysis (FEA).
METHODS: Two preaccessed mandibular molar TruTeeth (Endo 3DP; Acadental, Lenexa, KS) were subjected to simulated endodontic treatment in this study. One tooth was instrumented with ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), and the other was instrumented with V-Taper 2H (SS White Dental, Lakewood, NJ). The 2 teeth were scanned using micro-computed tomographic imaging, and stereolithographic surface meshes were developed for FEA. Each model was subjected to a 200-N multipoint load-simulating mastication. The results of the FEA provided quantitative and qualitative measurements for von Mises stress distribution and total deformation.
RESULTS: The maximum von Mises stress was greater in the ProTaper Gold-prepared model than the V-Taper 2H prepared model. In both models, total deformation values were highest in the clinical crown on the buccal aspect of the tooth. The highest stress values were found in the pericervical dentin, and stress decreased apically through the root.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the maximum stress values within the tooth prepared by ProTaper Gold were higher than those in the tooth prepared by V-Taper 2H. Canal preparation with the V-Taper 2H system preserves more pericervical dentin, which may increase the resistance to fracture.
METHODS: Two preaccessed mandibular molar TruTeeth (Endo 3DP; Acadental, Lenexa, KS) were subjected to simulated endodontic treatment in this study. One tooth was instrumented with ProTaper Gold (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties, Tulsa, OK), and the other was instrumented with V-Taper 2H (SS White Dental, Lakewood, NJ). The 2 teeth were scanned using micro-computed tomographic imaging, and stereolithographic surface meshes were developed for FEA. Each model was subjected to a 200-N multipoint load-simulating mastication. The results of the FEA provided quantitative and qualitative measurements for von Mises stress distribution and total deformation.
RESULTS: The maximum von Mises stress was greater in the ProTaper Gold-prepared model than the V-Taper 2H prepared model. In both models, total deformation values were highest in the clinical crown on the buccal aspect of the tooth. The highest stress values were found in the pericervical dentin, and stress decreased apically through the root.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that the maximum stress values within the tooth prepared by ProTaper Gold were higher than those in the tooth prepared by V-Taper 2H. Canal preparation with the V-Taper 2H system preserves more pericervical dentin, which may increase the resistance to fracture.