[Is condylar resorption a contra-indication for surgery?].

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic condylar resorption, often fortuitously discovered when performing orthodontic-surgical assessment, is a clinical entity in itself. There is a significant risk of postoperative degenerating and worsening. Is this sufficient to contra-indicate orthognathic surgery? The authors suggest an answer after studying a series of patients.

MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective study of 10 consecutive patients was made from July 1999 to October 2004. The preoperative assessment was triple: clinical, radiological and photographic. At least 6 months of occlusal, radiological and morphological stability was observed before any therapy was initiated. A fixed orthodontic set-up was placed and patients were regularly followed by a speech therapist for parafunctions. Stability of the occlusal correction, acquisition of a more harmonious aesthetic profile, and resolution of joint symptomatology were used to define therapeutic success at one year.

RESULTS

All patients were female. Resorption affected the mandibular side of the joint in all cases and the temporal side in 7 cases. Three types of osteotomies were performed: maxillary (N=1), mandibular (N=5), and bibasilar (N=4). Genioplasty was not systematic. Joint symptoms were resolved in all cases. Postoperative occlusion corresponded to the therapeutic project in 9 cases. All patients were aesthetically improved.

DISCUSSION: Idiopathic condylar resorption is not a contra-indication for orthognathic surgery. However, this treatment requires meeting and respecting four principles: a minimal delay of 6 months of occlusal, radiological, and morphological stability, an adapted and meticulous surgical technique, early and prolonged parafunction therapy, and a close follow-up of the patients.