DOI 10.1016/j.dental.2020.12.002
Thickness influence of veneering composites on fiber-reinforced systems.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Short fiber reinforced composites (SFRC) require a veneering layer of conventional composite when used as restorations in the oral environment. The current study investigates the toughening effects during the path of a preexisting crack propagating through the bilayer system as it confronts the interface, through the attempted alignment of fibers and matrix-fiber interactions in the SFRC, and the distance it travels in the SFRC.
METHODS
Bilayer systems of SFRC and conventional composite were produced with aligned fibers perpendicular to load direction. Single-edge-notched bend (SENB) specimens (25 × 5 × 2.5 mm3) with pre-crack length (a) to width (W) ratios (a/W = 0.2-0.8) were produced and tested in 3-point bending configuration until complete fracture. The specific work of fracture (we) was deduced from calculating the area under the load-displacement curves. Fiber alignment was digitally evaluated from images taken from the top and side planes of the specimen.
RESULTS
The toughness of the bilayer system is optimal when maximum SFRC thickness is used. EWF methods showed toughness and increasing nonessential work of fracture scaling with ligament length. A longer distance is accompanied by a higher distribution of aligned fibers bridging behind the crack wake, reducing crack driving forces at the crack tip.
SIGNIFICANCE: SFRC materials provide increasing toughening potential with increasing thickness, and have the ability to be more anisotropic than other composite materials. Clinically, the layer must have a conventional composite cover layer, but which thickness does not affect toughness potential. Therefore the thickness of the conventional composite can be dictated by wear behavior.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.