MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.543

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA facial plastic surgery · 2014

Postoperative maxillomandibular fixation after open reduction of mandible fractures.

Saman Masoud, Kadakia Sameep, Ducic Yadranko

Clinical StudyСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

IMPORTANCE

Patients are placed in maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) to restore premorbid occlusion prior to open reduction-internal fixation (ORIF) of mandibular fractures. Maintaining MMF for these patients for several weeks postoperatively is a widely accepted dictum.

OBJECTIVE

We compare postoperative ORIF outcomes in dentate patients with noncomminuted symphyseal, parasymphyseal, or angle fractures of the mandible between those who underwent postoperative MMF and those who did not.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND

PARTICIPANTS

Retrospective review of medical records for 311 patients with 413 mandibular fractures treated at a level 1 public trauma center in the Fort Worth, Texas, metropolitan area. All patients were treated from August 1997 to August 2012 and had a minimum follow-up of 6 weeks.

INTERVENTIONS: Of the 413 symphyseal, parasymphyseal, and angle fractures, 78, 63, and 83 patients were treated with postoperative MMF respectively. The group without postoperative MMF included 56 symphyseal fractures, 49 parasymphyseal fractures, and 84 angle fractures.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Rates of wound dehiscence, infection, plate removal, nonunion, malunion, and malocclusion were compared.

RESULTS

Using an unpaired t test and α value of .05 for significance, the difference between the 2 groups' outcomes was not statistically significant for any of the complications evaluated. In the groups with vs without postoperative MMF, the mean numbers of complications were as follows: wound dehiscence, 4.7 vs 2.5 (95% CI, -1.7 to 6.0) (P = .16); infection, 6.7 vs 4.0 (95% CI, -1.7 to 7.0) (P = .14); plate removal, 2.3 vs 2.5 (95% CI, -7.9 to 7.6) (P = .94); nonunion, 1.0 vs 0.5 (95% CI, -2.2 to 3.2) (P = .59); malunion, 0.7 vs 1.0 (95% CI, -3.1 to 2.4) (P = .72); and malocclusion, 1.3 vs 1.0 (95% CI, -4.0 to 4.7) (P = .82).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The surgical dictum of maintaining postoperative MMF for all trauma patients after ORIF of the mandible may not be of advantage in the treatment of dentate patients with noncomminuted symphyseal, parasymphyseal, or angle fractures.

Для цитирования: Saman Masoud, Kadakia Sameep, Ducic Yadranko. Postoperative maxillomandibular fixation after open reduction of mandible fractures.. JAMA facial plastic surgery. 2014. DOI: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.543.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.