MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.006

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery · 2006

Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury.

Calvo Emilio, López-Franco Mariano, Arribas Ignacio M

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of posttraumatic anatomic alterations after surgical or conservative treatment of type III injuries and to analyze their effect on the outcome. Forty-three patients were evaluated retrospectively, clinically and radiographically, at a 12-month minimum follow-up. Thirty-two were treated surgically, using the Phemister technique, and 11 had conservative treatment. A comparison of the overall clinical results in both groups showed no statistically significant differences. The acromioclavicular joint was anatomically reduced in only half of the surgical patients. Those shoulders treated surgically showed a significantly higher incidence of osteoarthritis and coracoclavicular ligament ossification. Differences in clavicular deformity or osteolysis were not significant. None of these abnormalities had any influence on the clinical result. Because operative and conservative treatments achieve equally good clinical results and surgery carries a higher risk of osteoarthritis, we recommend managing this injury conservatively.

Для цитирования: Calvo Emilio, López-Franco Mariano, Arribas Ignacio M. Clinical and radiologic outcomes of surgical and conservative treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint injury.. Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery. 2006. DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.10.006.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.