DOI 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.013
Effect of aging on fracture resistance and torque loss of restorations supported by zirconia and polyetheretherketone abutments: An in vitro study.
Аннотация
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: New materials have been developed for digital processing, including implant abutments, but studies on their mechanical properties are lacking.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of aging on the fracture resistance, failure mode, and torque loss of restorations made of zirconia and ceramic-reinforced polyetheretherketone (PEEK) abutments with titanium bases.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Titanium-based PEEK and zirconia abutments were milled and veneered with composite resin or feldspathic porcelain in the form of maxillary first premolars (n=10). All the specimens were subjected to an aging process and were assessed after every 250 000 cycles under a stereomicroscope, and torque loss was recorded with an electronic torque meter. Fracture resistance was measured under static load (crosshead speed of 1 mm/min), and failure modes and final torque were determined. A t test was conducted for statistical analyses (α=.05).
RESULTS
The fracture resistance of the zirconia restorations was significantly greater than the PEEK-based restorations (P=.001). Torque losses were not significantly different after aging (P=.18); however, significant difference was recorded after the fracture test (P=.007). The effect of fracture load was significantly greater for the zirconia group (P<.001). Unlike with the zirconia group, the failure mode in the PEEK-based restorations was mainly adhesive and favorable (9 of 10 specimens).
CONCLUSIONS
Ceramic-reinforced PEEK abutments had acceptable resistance to fracture, a favorable failure mode, and successfully sustained the aging process.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.