MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/ket264

Медицинская библиотека · Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2013

Yoga for rheumatic diseases: a systematic review.

Cramer Holger, Lauche Romy, Langhorst Jost, Dobos Gustav

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendation for yoga as an ancillary intervention in rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

Medline/PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library and IndMED were searched through February 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing yoga with control interventions in patients with rheumatic diseases were included. Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Back Review Group risk of bias tool. The quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendation for or against yoga were graded according to the GRADE recommendations.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs with a total of 559 subjects were included; two RCTs had a low risk of bias. In two RCTs on FM syndrome, there was very low evidence for effects on pain and low evidence for effects on disability. In three RCTs on OA, there was very low evidence for effects on pain and disability. Based on two RCTs, very low evidence was found for effects on pain in RA. No evidence for effects on pain was found in one RCT on CTS. No RCT explicitly reported safety data.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this review, only weak recommendations can be made for the ancillary use of yoga in the management of FM syndrome, OA and RA at this point.

Для цитирования: Cramer Holger, Lauche Romy, Langhorst Jost, Dobos Gustav. Yoga for rheumatic diseases: a systematic review.. Rheumatology (Oxford, England). 2013. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket264.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.