MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.00589.2015

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2017

In vivo assessment of regional mechanics post-myocardial infarction: A focus on the road ahead.

Romito Eva, Shazly Tarek, Spinale Francis G

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Cardiovascular disease, particularly the occurrence of myocardial infarction (MI), remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality (Go et al., Circulation 127: e6-e245, 2013; Go et al. Circulation 129: e28-e292, 2014). There is growing recognition that a key factor for post-MI outcomes is adverse remodeling and changes in the regional structure, composition, and mechanical properties of the MI region itself. However, in vivo assessment of regional mechanics post-MI can be confounded by the species, temporal aspects of MI healing, as well as size, location, and extent of infarction across myocardial wall. Moreover, MI regional mechanics have been assessed over varying phases of the cardiac cycle, and thus, uniform conclusions regarding the material properties of the MI region can be difficult. This review assesses past studies that have performed in vivo measures of MI mechanics and attempts to provide coalescence on key points from these studies, as well as offer potential recommendations for unifying approaches in terms of regional post-MI mechanics. A uniform approach to biophysical measures of import will allow comparisons across studies, as well as provide a basis for potential therapeutic markers.

Для цитирования: Romito Eva, Shazly Tarek, Spinale Francis G. In vivo assessment of regional mechanics post-myocardial infarction: A focus on the road ahead.. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985). 2017. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00589.2015.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.