MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jobcr.2012.10.001

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research · 2012

Fractures of angle of mandible - A retrospective study.

Singh Sourav, Fry Ramesh R, Joshi Ajit, Sharma Geeta, Singh Smita

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIMS: This retrospective study was done to evaluate the efficacy of single miniplate osteosynthesis at superior border of angle of mandible.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

In this study 50 patients were treated by single miniplate osteosynthesis according to Champy's principle. Bite force generated was used as a parameter for judging the efficacy of internal fixation. In this article we present our experience over the years in the management of the fractures of angle of mandible based on this model.

RESULTS

Most patients were of 21-30 yrs of age with unilateral angle fracture of mandible except one patient who had isolated bilateral angle fracture. The patients were treated successfully according to Champy's principle of osteosynthesis. There was a progressive improvement in the bite force generated after osteosynthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

The angle of the mandible is an anatomically weak and an area susceptible to fracture. The presence of an impacted or partially erupted third molar tooth further weakens it. Angle of mandible is the most common site for fracture however, bilateral angle fracture is very rare and uncommon. Osteosynthesis according to Champy's model led to an early functional improvement as demonstrated by the bite force generated.

Для цитирования: Singh Sourav, Fry Ramesh R, Joshi Ajit, Sharma Geeta, Singh Smita. Fractures of angle of mandible - A retrospective study.. Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2012.10.001.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.