MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/1947-2714.145459

Медицинская библиотека · North American journal of medical sciences · 2014

Awareness of Forensic Odontology among Legal Professionals, Chennai, India.

Selvajothi Packiaraj, Lavanya Chandra, Joshua Elizabeth, Rao Umadevi K, Ranganathan Kannan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The forensic discipline of law is a multidisciplinary team comprising of specialists in forensic medicine, forensic odontology, security and law.

AIM: The study was to find the awareness level of scope and utility of forensic odontology among lawyers in Chennai, South India.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using a self administered structured questionnaire was conducted in 200 lawyers between August and September of 2013. The data was analyzed depending on age, gender, type and years of practice.

RESULTS

Lawyers above 40 years of experience were more aware of palatal rugae analysis (P = 0.02), and those with more than 20 years were aware of lip print (P = 0.001) and bite mark analysis (P = 0.001). Males were more aware of forensic odontology with respect to criminal identification (P = 0.001). The knowledge of bite mark analysis was higher among male lawyers (P = 0.001), civil and criminal practicing lawyers (P = 0.004). All participants were aware that loss or fracture of tooth constitutes a grievous injury under Indian Penal Code (IPC) 320 clause 7(5).

CONCLUSION

This study highlighted the knowledge of forensic odontology among legal professionals and also identified the areas in which they need further appraisal.

Для цитирования: Selvajothi Packiaraj, Lavanya Chandra, Joshua Elizabeth, Rao Umadevi K, Ranganathan Kannan. Awareness of Forensic Odontology among Legal Professionals, Chennai, India.. North American journal of medical sciences. 2014. DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.145459.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.