American journal of dentistry · 2013
Shear resistance of fiber-reinforced composite and metal dentin pins.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Fennis Willem M M, Wolke Joop G C, Machado Camilo, Creugers Nico H J, Kreulen Cees M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To assess whether dentin pins increase shear resistance of extensive composite restorations and to compare performance of mini fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) anchors with metal dentin pins in the laboratory.
METHODS: 30 extracted sound molars were randomly divided into three groups. Occlusal surfaces were ground flat with a standard surface area and resin composite restorations were made in Group A. In Groups B and C similar restorations were made, with additionally four metal pins placed in Group B and four FRC pins in Group C. Specimens were statically loaded until failure occurred. Failure modes were characterized as intact remaining tooth substrate (adhesive or cohesive failure of restoration) or fractured remaining tooth substrate.
RESULTS: Mean failure stresses were 6.5 MPa (SD 3.2 MPa) for Group A, 9.7 MPa (SD 2.6 MPa) for Group B and 9.2 MPa (SD 2.6 MPa) for Group C. Difference in mean failure stresses between Group A and Groups B and C was statistically significant (P = 0.01), while the difference between Groups B and C was not (P = 0.63). Failures of the restoration without fracture of tooth substrate were seen for 80% of specimens in Group A and 20% in Groups B and C (P = 0.04).
METHODS: 30 extracted sound molars were randomly divided into three groups. Occlusal surfaces were ground flat with a standard surface area and resin composite restorations were made in Group A. In Groups B and C similar restorations were made, with additionally four metal pins placed in Group B and four FRC pins in Group C. Specimens were statically loaded until failure occurred. Failure modes were characterized as intact remaining tooth substrate (adhesive or cohesive failure of restoration) or fractured remaining tooth substrate.
RESULTS: Mean failure stresses were 6.5 MPa (SD 3.2 MPa) for Group A, 9.7 MPa (SD 2.6 MPa) for Group B and 9.2 MPa (SD 2.6 MPa) for Group C. Difference in mean failure stresses between Group A and Groups B and C was statistically significant (P = 0.01), while the difference between Groups B and C was not (P = 0.63). Failures of the restoration without fracture of tooth substrate were seen for 80% of specimens in Group A and 20% in Groups B and C (P = 0.04).
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Acid Etching, DentalAdhesivenessAminosalicylic AcidsComposite ResinsDental AlloysDental MaterialsDental PinsDental Restoration, PermanentDental Stress AnalysisDentinDentin-Bonding AgentsGlassHumansMaterials TestingMethacrylatesPhosphoric AcidsResin CementsShear StrengthStress, MechanicalTooth Preparation