[Comparison of clinical effects of zygomatic implant-supported prostheses with different types of ring connectors].

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical effects of pure titanium-milled metal rings and cast gold alloy milled rods in the prosthetic rehabilitation of zygomatic implant-supported prostheses.

METHODS

A total of 11 patients were selected from January 2017 to October 2024 in Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine. The patients were repaired by zygomatic implant-supported prostheses with different types of ring connectors due to bilateral maxillary defects after tumor surgery. Among them, 6 cases used pure titanium-milled metal rings to connect the prosthetics, and the other 5 cases used cast gold alloy milled rods. The difference of repair effect was evaluated from 4 aspects: prosthesis retention, prosthesis wear, connection screw fractures and overall satisfaction.

RESULTS

Compared to pure titanium-milled metal rings, the cast gold alloy milled rod connection scored significantly lower in prosthesis retention, connection screw fractures, and overall scores(P＜0.05). No significant differences were observed in prosthesis wear or overall satisfaction(P＞0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Pure titanium-milled metal rings are a more suitable connection method for prosthetic rehabilitation of bilateral maxillary defects using zygomatic implants.