MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0163

Медицинская библиотека · Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine · 2024

Fascia Lata-Fat Island Graft in Septal Perforation Repair.

Hancı Deniz, Çelik Cem, Altun Hüseyin, Uyar Yavuz

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Objective

To measure the success of the fascia lata-fat island graft technique in septal perforation repair as measured by nasal endoscopic examination.

Background

This study presents the results of using fascia lata-fat island, a different graft technique, for the repair of septal perforations, offering an alternative to this challenging procedure.

Methods

This retrospective study assesses nasal septal perforation repair using the fascia lata-fat island graft technique performed by a single surgeon. Inclusion criteria involved completing 12-month follow-ups within a 3-year review period. Success rates were calculated and evaluated alongside patient characteristics.

Results

The median (range) age of the 25 patients included in the study was 34 (25-45) years and 72.0% were men. The septal perforation size of all patients was >2 cm and the etiological cause in all of them was previous septal surgery. All patients were followed for 12 months. The perforation was completely closed in 23 of 25 patients (92%).

Conclusion

Using a different graft with an open rhinoplasty approach, we achieved a high success rate in patients with large septal perforations, followed for 1 month with nasal stenting and an average follow-up duration of 12 months.

Для цитирования: Hancı Deniz, Çelik Cem, Altun Hüseyin, Uyar Yavuz. Fascia Lata-Fat Island Graft in Septal Perforation Repair.. Facial plastic surgery & aesthetic medicine. 2024. DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2023.0163.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.