JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025
A "Pandemic-Proof" Methodology for Outbreak Detection Adapted From COVID-19's Impact on Notifications of Infectious Diseases in the Netherlands: Surveillance Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
van Deursen Babette, Raven Stijn, van den Bosch Wolfer, van Jaarsveld Cornelia H M, Timen Aura
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Reporting of notifiable infectious diseases was overall impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This could affect disease surveillance and thus, outbreak detection, as it is based on historical data. For effective outbreak detection, it is crucial that communicable disease control professionals can rely on accurate and valuable alarm thresholds to ensure timely and adequate response to potential outbreaks.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we take the first steps in the development of a methodology that adjusts for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of notifications of notifiable infectious diseases and provides corrected alarm thresholds for outbreak detection. We identify which infectious diseases were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, assess the duration of these effects, and explore potential correction methods to improve outbreak detection.
METHODS: We analyzed cases of 25 notifiable infectious diseases reported from 2015-2023 in the Netherlands. Negative binomial regression was used to calculate the incidence rate ratios for each period: pre-COVID-19 pandemic, COVID 2020, COVID 2021, COVID 2022, and post-COVID-19 pandemic. To address the decrease in notifications during the COVID-19 pandemic, we tested 3 correction methods: (1) recoding COVID-19 years as missing; (2) imputing with the last pre-COVID-19 pandemic observation; and (3) imputing the historical moving average.
RESULTS: Between 2015-2023, a total of 74,990 notifications were reported in the Netherlands, of which 9,836 notifications (13%) occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Malaria, typhoid fever, hepatitis A, meningococcal infection, paratyphoid fever, Q-fever, shigellosis, measles, mumps, and pertussis had significantly lower notifications during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the duration and magnitude of the effect differed among the infections. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the notifications of malaria (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.36) and typhoid fever (IRR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.55) was only seen in 2020, while the notifications for measles (IRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.75) and pertussis (IRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.60) were still significantly lower in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period. In addition, the newly calculated alarm thresholds showed a noticeable difference compared with the original unadjusted alarm thresholds. However, the variation among the 3 different corrected alarm thresholds was not substantial.
CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, notifications of 10 infectious diseases declined significantly. The duration of this decline varied among infections, highlighting the need for pattern-specific adjustments. Our study demonstrates that accounting for the reduced notifications impacts alarm threshold calculations for outbreak detection. We therefore recommend amending the alarm thresholds to account for this impact to ensure reliable outbreak detection, so that communicable disease control professionals can act in a timely and data-driven manner. The next step in the development of the "pandemic-proof" methodology is to determine which correction method is most suitable. Further validation by communicable disease control professionals is essential to assess the applicability of the adjusted alarm thresholds for outbreak detection.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we take the first steps in the development of a methodology that adjusts for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of notifications of notifiable infectious diseases and provides corrected alarm thresholds for outbreak detection. We identify which infectious diseases were affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, assess the duration of these effects, and explore potential correction methods to improve outbreak detection.
METHODS: We analyzed cases of 25 notifiable infectious diseases reported from 2015-2023 in the Netherlands. Negative binomial regression was used to calculate the incidence rate ratios for each period: pre-COVID-19 pandemic, COVID 2020, COVID 2021, COVID 2022, and post-COVID-19 pandemic. To address the decrease in notifications during the COVID-19 pandemic, we tested 3 correction methods: (1) recoding COVID-19 years as missing; (2) imputing with the last pre-COVID-19 pandemic observation; and (3) imputing the historical moving average.
RESULTS: Between 2015-2023, a total of 74,990 notifications were reported in the Netherlands, of which 9,836 notifications (13%) occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Malaria, typhoid fever, hepatitis A, meningococcal infection, paratyphoid fever, Q-fever, shigellosis, measles, mumps, and pertussis had significantly lower notifications during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the duration and magnitude of the effect differed among the infections. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the notifications of malaria (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.17, 95% CI 0.08-0.36) and typhoid fever (IRR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02-0.55) was only seen in 2020, while the notifications for measles (IRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.15-0.75) and pertussis (IRR 0.34, 95% CI 0.20-0.60) were still significantly lower in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period. In addition, the newly calculated alarm thresholds showed a noticeable difference compared with the original unadjusted alarm thresholds. However, the variation among the 3 different corrected alarm thresholds was not substantial.
CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, notifications of 10 infectious diseases declined significantly. The duration of this decline varied among infections, highlighting the need for pattern-specific adjustments. Our study demonstrates that accounting for the reduced notifications impacts alarm threshold calculations for outbreak detection. We therefore recommend amending the alarm thresholds to account for this impact to ensure reliable outbreak detection, so that communicable disease control professionals can act in a timely and data-driven manner. The next step in the development of the "pandemic-proof" methodology is to determine which correction method is most suitable. Further validation by communicable disease control professionals is essential to assess the applicability of the adjusted alarm thresholds for outbreak detection.