DOI 10.1097/wno.0000000000002538
Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Differentiation of Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy and Central Retinal Artery Occlusion: Longitudinal Analysis of Inner Retinal Layer Thinning.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) and central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) are both causes of acute vision loss. When patients present within the first several weeks of symptom onset, clinical signs such as optic disc or inner retinal edema often allow differentiation. However, as time progresses and edema resolves, both diseases lead to optic atrophy and retinal thinning, sometimes making them difficult to distinguish. Clinical experience suggests that CRAO results in more significant thinning of the inner retinal layers, particularly the ganglion cell layer (GCL), compared with NAION. This study seeks to investigate whether these differences remain detectable months after symptom onset and whether optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging can reliably distinguish these entities in the chronic phase.
METHODS
This is a retrospective single-center cohort study comparing OCT-derived ganglion cell thickness, total retinal thickness, and asymmetry of inferior/superior hemiretinas in patients with NAION and CRAO who presented early after vision loss and underwent follow-up imaging at approximately 3, 6, or 12 months.
RESULTS
At all time points, GCL and retina thinning were more severe in the CRAO group. The ratio of GCL to total retina was significantly lower in the CRAO group. More asymmetry was observed in the NAION group, with the superior hemiretina more frequently affected.
CONCLUSIONS
OCT average GCL thickness determined by automatic segmentation is an excellent discriminator between prior CRAO and prior NAION eyes at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.