Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica · 2021
Antegrade endoscopic dilatation as an alternative approach to primary obstructive megaureter.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Álvarez N, García-Núñez B, Esteva C, Pérez-Gaspar M, Santiago S, Betancourth J, Jiménez J, Falcó J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Congenital primary obstructive megaureter (POM) is caused by ureterovesical junction stenosis, reduced peristalsis, and the resulting dilatation. Even though ureteral re-implantation remains the current gold standard technique, retrograde dilatation is considered as an effective therapeutic alternative with good results and growing proponents - to the extent it has become the technique of choice in some healthcare facilities. The objective was to present an alternative approach for treatment purposes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is the case of a 5-month-old infant with POM and pyonephrosis requiring nephrostomy and intravenous antibiotic therapy. Endoscopic dilatation was carried out by means of a percutaneous drainage in an antegrade fashion and did not require cystoscopy.
RESULTS: The procedure was uneventful. During follow-up, ureterohydronephrosis decreased, while ureteral dilatation persisted to a lesser extent with an adequate peristalsis and absence of secondary VUR. The patient has had no symptoms after an 11-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: POM antegrade dilatation is an effective alternative in selected patients as it makes the pathology disappear.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is the case of a 5-month-old infant with POM and pyonephrosis requiring nephrostomy and intravenous antibiotic therapy. Endoscopic dilatation was carried out by means of a percutaneous drainage in an antegrade fashion and did not require cystoscopy.
RESULTS: The procedure was uneventful. During follow-up, ureterohydronephrosis decreased, while ureteral dilatation persisted to a lesser extent with an adequate peristalsis and absence of secondary VUR. The patient has had no symptoms after an 11-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: POM antegrade dilatation is an effective alternative in selected patients as it makes the pathology disappear.