Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2001
Laser-assisted hair transplantation: histologic comparison between CO2 and Ho:YAG lasers.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chu E A, Rabinov C R, Wong B J, Krugman M E
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Various laser wavelengths and devices have been advocated for use in the creation of recipient channels during hair transplant surgery, including flash-scanned CO2, Ho:YAG (lambda = 2.12 microm), and Er:YAG (lambda = 2.94 microm).
OBJECTIVE: To determine the tissue injury caused by flash-scanned CO2 and pulsed Ho:YAG lasers during the creation of hair transplant recipient channels and to assess the efficacy of the Ho:YAG laser.
METHODS: Recipient channels were created in vivo in human scalp tissue using both lasers, and were excised and prepared for histologic examination. Optical micrometry of tissue sections was used to assess thermal injury.
RESULTS: The Ho:YAG laser created jagged, irregular-shaped channels with larger zones of thermal injury (superficial deepithelialization, thermal necrosis, and thermal damage). In contrast, the CO2 laser produced well-defined cylindrically shaped channels free of cellular debris with minimal epithelial disruption and significantly less lateral thermal injury.
CONCLUSION: Given that the Ho:YAG produced larger regions of thermal injury and recipient channels that were unacceptable for graft, the CO2 laser remains the better choice for the creation of recipient channels during hair transplant surgery. However, ongoing research will be necessary to determine the optimal laser wavelength and/or devices for this procedure.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the tissue injury caused by flash-scanned CO2 and pulsed Ho:YAG lasers during the creation of hair transplant recipient channels and to assess the efficacy of the Ho:YAG laser.
METHODS: Recipient channels were created in vivo in human scalp tissue using both lasers, and were excised and prepared for histologic examination. Optical micrometry of tissue sections was used to assess thermal injury.
RESULTS: The Ho:YAG laser created jagged, irregular-shaped channels with larger zones of thermal injury (superficial deepithelialization, thermal necrosis, and thermal damage). In contrast, the CO2 laser produced well-defined cylindrically shaped channels free of cellular debris with minimal epithelial disruption and significantly less lateral thermal injury.
CONCLUSION: Given that the Ho:YAG produced larger regions of thermal injury and recipient channels that were unacceptable for graft, the CO2 laser remains the better choice for the creation of recipient channels during hair transplant surgery. However, ongoing research will be necessary to determine the optimal laser wavelength and/or devices for this procedure.