MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4322/acr.2019.103

Медицинская библиотека · Autopsy & case reports · 2019

The importance of the postmortem interval for the diagnosis of Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome by Neisseria meningitidis in a series of forensic cases.

Gentile Guendalina, Amadasi Alberto, Bailo Paolo, Boracchi Michele, Maciocco Francesca, Marchesi Matteo, Zoja Riccardo

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The effective value of microbiological post-mortem examinations stands as fundamental in forensic cases involving microbiology. We ran these analyses on five victims, who suddenly died after showing persistent fever. The examinations were conducted between 48 hours and 10 days after death, and adrenal gland apoplexy was detected in all the cases. Microbiological examinations identified Neisseria meningitidis, which was accountable for Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome. Diplococci were isolated from three cadavers that underwent forensic dissection between 2 and 3 days after death. The remaining two cadavers showed polymicrobial contamination, and a polymerase chain reaction technique was necessary to identify the pathogen. We assumed that the microbial overlap could lead to diagnostic mistakes and conceal the identification of the lethal pathogen. Therefore, we suggest using molecular techniques for a postmortem interval (PMI) longer than 72 hours. Classical microbiological examination should be performed for PMI within 72 hours.

Для цитирования: Gentile Guendalina, Amadasi Alberto, Bailo Paolo, Boracchi Michele, Maciocco Francesca, Marchesi Matteo, Zoja Riccardo. The importance of the postmortem interval for the diagnosis of Waterhouse-Friderichsen syndrome by Neisseria meningitidis in a series of forensic cases.. Autopsy & case reports. 2019. DOI: 10.4322/acr.2019.103.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.