Trauma case reports · 2024
Intraocular eyelash in anterior chamber following penetrating trauma and self-sealing corneal laceration: Case report.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pourazizi Mohsen, Karbasi Sepehr, Rahmanipour Elham
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intraocular foreign bodies pose a significant clinical challenge. The occurrence of an eyelash within the anterior chamber is infrequent, as illustrated by this case. We present a rare case of two eyelashes inside the anterior chamber following penetrating trauma, a scenario with few documented occurrences, especially those not related to surgical interventions.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 35-year-old male presented with symptoms of a foreign body sensation, redness, blurred vision, and photophobia two days after sustaining a wire-induced injury. Examination revealed a self-sealing corneal laceration, two eyelashes in the anterior chamber, iridocorneal adhesion, and an irregular iris. The surgical removal of the eyelashes was successfully performed. Postoperatively, the patient's visual acuity improved significantly from 20/50 to 20/20, accompanied by a marked reduction in anterior chamber inflammation.
CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of considering all types of intraocular foreign bodies, including seemingly innocuous materials like eyelashes, to diagnose ocular traumas. It highlights the critical need for prompt diagnosis and intervention to prevent long-term complications and ensure favorable outcomes.
CASE DESCRIPTION: A 35-year-old male presented with symptoms of a foreign body sensation, redness, blurred vision, and photophobia two days after sustaining a wire-induced injury. Examination revealed a self-sealing corneal laceration, two eyelashes in the anterior chamber, iridocorneal adhesion, and an irregular iris. The surgical removal of the eyelashes was successfully performed. Postoperatively, the patient's visual acuity improved significantly from 20/50 to 20/20, accompanied by a marked reduction in anterior chamber inflammation.
CONCLUSION: This case highlights the importance of considering all types of intraocular foreign bodies, including seemingly innocuous materials like eyelashes, to diagnose ocular traumas. It highlights the critical need for prompt diagnosis and intervention to prevent long-term complications and ensure favorable outcomes.