MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4067/s0034-98872024000500621

Медицинская библиотека · Revista medica de Chile · 2024

[Case Report: Guillain-Barré Syndrome with Difficult-to-manage Pain and Persistent Urinary Retention].

Sánchez E Cristian, Iglesias A Cristóbal, Almuna A Constanza, Liberona R Andrés, Quintana C Leonidas

Клинический случайСтатьяАннотация на английскомПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is an acute inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy that affects the peripheral nervous system, predominantly impairing motor function. Pain, both somatic and neuropathic, is reported in 89% of cases and is refractory to first-line analgesics in most of these. We present the case of a 75-year-old woman with an acute presentation of areflexic flaccid tetraparesis compatible with GBS. She received treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), which improved the motor component, but she experienced pain refractory to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and pregabalin, as well as persistent urinary retention with unsuccessful attempts to remove the urinary catheter. Transdermal fentanyl was administered with good response and tolerance, in addition to tamsulosin and intermittent catheterization, resulting in the successful removal of the catheter after six weeks. Based on this case, individualized evaluation of pain and urinary retention in GBS is suggested, considering the use of transdermal opioids and non-invasive bladder emptying measures, respectively.

Для цитирования: Sánchez E Cristian, Iglesias A Cristóbal, Almuna A Constanza, Liberona R Andrés, Quintana C Leonidas. [Case Report: Guillain-Barré Syndrome with Difficult-to-manage Pain and Persistent Urinary Retention].. Revista medica de Chile. 2024. DOI: 10.4067/s0034-98872024000500621.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.