Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2018
Location and distribution of craniomaxillofacial fractures in 45 cats presented for the treatment of head trauma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Tundo Ingrid, Southerden Peter, Perry Andrew, Haydock Richard M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the location and distribution of craniomaxillofacial (CMF) fractures in 45 cats presented to a veterinary referral centre between 2012 and 2017.
METHODS: Cats with a history of head trauma, one or more CMF fractures and a pretreatment CT scan of the CMF region were included in this study. For the purpose of the study, the CMF skeleton was divided into 15 functional anatomical regions and the fracture sites were allocated to one of these functional regions. Statistical analysis was performed using R.
RESULTS: Skull fractures were evident in 80.0% of cats, and mandibular fractures in 86.7% of cats in this study. The median number of anatomical functional regions affected was eight and there was evidence of moderate or strong correlation between fractures of different regions of the mid-face. Where fractures were recorded in the nasopharynx and orbit they were bilateral in 93.5% and 89.7%, respectively. Twenty-six (57.8%) of the cats had fractures affecting one or both temporomandibular joints, which included fractures of the mandibular fossa, condylar neck and condyle. Twenty-nine cats (64.4%) had tooth fractures and seven cats (15.6%) had significant eye injuries.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cats presenting with a single symphyseal separation or parasymphyseal fracture are very likely to have further fractures at other locations. Fractures in the nasopharynx, orbit, nose, upper jaw, intermaxillary suture and zygomatic arch regions (the 'mid-face') are likely to occur together. The pattern of distribution of mandibular fractures is not as predictable as that for maxillary fractures. CT imaging is required to achieve a complete diagnosis of the location and distribution of skull fractures in cats after head trauma.
METHODS: Cats with a history of head trauma, one or more CMF fractures and a pretreatment CT scan of the CMF region were included in this study. For the purpose of the study, the CMF skeleton was divided into 15 functional anatomical regions and the fracture sites were allocated to one of these functional regions. Statistical analysis was performed using R.
RESULTS: Skull fractures were evident in 80.0% of cats, and mandibular fractures in 86.7% of cats in this study. The median number of anatomical functional regions affected was eight and there was evidence of moderate or strong correlation between fractures of different regions of the mid-face. Where fractures were recorded in the nasopharynx and orbit they were bilateral in 93.5% and 89.7%, respectively. Twenty-six (57.8%) of the cats had fractures affecting one or both temporomandibular joints, which included fractures of the mandibular fossa, condylar neck and condyle. Twenty-nine cats (64.4%) had tooth fractures and seven cats (15.6%) had significant eye injuries.
CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Cats presenting with a single symphyseal separation or parasymphyseal fracture are very likely to have further fractures at other locations. Fractures in the nasopharynx, orbit, nose, upper jaw, intermaxillary suture and zygomatic arch regions (the 'mid-face') are likely to occur together. The pattern of distribution of mandibular fractures is not as predictable as that for maxillary fractures. CT imaging is required to achieve a complete diagnosis of the location and distribution of skull fractures in cats after head trauma.