MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/17562864241301361

Медицинская библиотека · Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2024

Complement inhibition in seropositive generalized myasthenia gravis as rescue therapy in impending and effective treatment in frequently recurring impending myasthenic crisis-a case series.

Menacher Martina, Ellssel Monika, Kwiedor Isabelle, Naumann Markus, Bayas Antonios

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In seropositive myasthenia gravis (MG), complement inhibition has been shown to be an effective and a fast-acting therapeutic option. Myasthenic crisis (MC), usually preceded by impending MC, is a life-threatening complication requiring highly effective treatments with rapid onset of action. Currently used treatment options of MC are limited, consisting mainly of symptomatic and immune therapies, that is, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasma exchange/immunoadsorption. So far, there is only very limited data on complement inhibitors in impending or manifest MC or termination of frequently recurring impending crises. Here, we report three cases of acetylcholine receptor antibody positive MG, two with impending and one case suffering from high-frequency impending MC, where complement inhibition with eculizumab or ravulizumab resulted in a rapid and sustained remission. Meningococcal vaccination, mandatory when using complement inhibitors, did not result in symptom-worsening or manifest MC.

Для цитирования: Menacher Martina, Ellssel Monika, Kwiedor Isabelle, Naumann Markus, Bayas Antonios. Complement inhibition in seropositive generalized myasthenia gravis as rescue therapy in impending and effective treatment in frequently recurring impending myasthenic crisis-a case series.. Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders. 2024. DOI: 10.1177/17562864241301361.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.