MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00117-020-00702-5

Медицинская библиотека · Der Radiologe · 2020

[Skull and cervical spine fractures].

Langner Sönke, Roloff Anne-Marie, Schraven Sebastian P, Weber Marc-André, Henker Christian

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Injuries of the skull and the cervical spine are common trauma sequelae and prompt diagnosis is of utmost importance to prevent neurologic complications.

OBJECTIVES

The different imaging modalities for the diagnosis of skull and cervical spine fractures are presented and discussed in the context of the current literature.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Common fractures of the skull and cervical spine and their classification systems are described. Indications for imaging are discussed within the context of the literature.

RESULTS

Fractures of the head can affect the cranial vault, the base of the skull, and the petrous bone. Injuries to the dura are associated with an open craniocerebral trauma. Fractures of the cervical spine can be subdivided into fractures of the craniocervical junction and subaxial fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

The imaging modality of choice in the acute setting is computed tomography (CT). Skull fractures can be differentiated into open and closed craniocerebral traumas and accompanying intracranial trauma sequelae must be recognized. In the case of petrous bone fractures, attention must always be paid to the middle and inner ear structures. In cervical spine fractures, decisive is whether the fracture is stable or unstable and whether there has been an accompanying injury to the myelon.

Для цитирования: Langner Sönke, Roloff Anne-Marie, Schraven Sebastian P, Weber Marc-André, Henker Christian. [Skull and cervical spine fractures].. Der Radiologe. 2020. DOI: 10.1007/s00117-020-00702-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.