MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/eurheartj/ehag520

Медицинская библиотека · European heart journal · 2026

Micro-axial flow pump vs veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial.

Zhao Gang, Zhou Shanshan, Fang Zheyan, Ma Jianying, Tian Feng, Song Dan, Xu Chengyi, Yuan Zuyi, Guo Ning, Zhao Lin, Zhang Tao, Wang Jingping, Liu Jingyi, Yang Yining, Yu Xiaolin, Li Yan, Zhang Dongwei, Gao Chuanyu, Ye Famin, Zhang Cheng, Yang Jianmin, Xiu Jiancheng, Wang Qiancheng, Luan Bo, Tao Jianhong, Bai Ming, Yang Renqiang, Guo Yansong, Wang Yan, Dai Min, Wang Jianan, Qian Juying, Chen Yundai, Ge Junbo

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The efficacy of prophylactic mechanical circulatory support with micro-axial flow pump or veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) undergoing high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains unclear.

METHODS

Patients with complex three-vessel disease, unprotected left main coronary disease or last patent conduit and LVEF ≤ 35% were assigned to receive either a micro-axial flow pump (SynFlow 3.0) or VA-ECMO support during a non-emergent high-risk PCI procedure in this prospective, multicentre, randomized, open-label, non-inferiority trial. The primary endpoint was the incidence of 30-day major adverse events, defined as any of: all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, repeat revascularization, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, cardiopulmonary resuscitation/cardioversion, cardiac surgery/limb ischaemia, or serious device-related complications. Safety endpoints included adverse events and serious adverse events.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint, 30-day major adverse events, occurred in 8 of 109 patients (7.34%) in the SynFlow 3.0 group and 13 of 113 patients (11.5%) in the VA-ECMO group (absolute difference adjusted for centre effect, -4.6%; 95% confidence interval, -12.6% to 3.5%; P for non-inferiority < .001). Patients with SynFlow 3.0 had shorter post-procedural hospital stay (4.1 days vs 5.2 days on average, P = .047) and fewer device-related adverse events (3.7% vs 11.5%; P = .041). Anaemia occurred more often with VA-ECMO than with SynFlow 3.0 (20.4% vs 9.2%; P = .023).

CONCLUSIONS

The prophylactic use of a micro-axial flow pump during high-risk PCI procedures was non-inferior to VA-ECMO in the incidence of 30-day major adverse events. The use of a micro-axial flow pump was associated with shorter post-procedural hospital stay and fewer device-related adverse events.

Для цитирования: Zhao Gang, Zhou Shanshan, Fang Zheyan, Ma Jianying, Tian Feng, Song Dan, Xu Chengyi, Yuan Zuyi, Guo Ning, Zhao Lin, Zhang Tao, Wang Jingping, Liu Jingyi, Yang Yining, Yu Xiaolin, Li Yan, Zhang Dongwei, Gao Chuanyu, Ye Famin, Zhang Cheng, Yang Jianmin, Xiu Jiancheng, Wang Qiancheng, Luan Bo, Tao Jianhong, Bai Ming, Yang Renqiang, Guo Yansong, Wang Yan, Dai Min, Wang Jianan, Qian Juying, Chen Yundai, Ge Junbo. Micro-axial flow pump vs veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions: a randomized trial.. European heart journal. 2026. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehag520.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.