European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
Comparison of flail and multiple simple rib fracture patterns among patients included in rib fracture studies; A systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luttjeboer Maartje L, Van Lieshout Esther M M, Pieracci Fredric M, Bauman Zachary M, Eriksson Evert A, Forrester Joseph D, Verhofstad Michael H J, Wijffels Mathieu M E
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Comparing baseline characteristics of patients with flail versus multiple simple rib fracture patterns, hypothesizing greater injury severity in the flail group. METHODS: A systematic review of Cochrane Central, Embase, Medline Ovid, and Web of Science identified 66 cohorts from 1,799 records. Random effects models were used, with publication bias assessed via funnel plots. Primary outcome was injury severity score (ISS); secondary outcomes included number and level of fractured ribs and associated injuries. RESULTS: Patients with flail fractures had significantly higher ISS (mean 27 vs 20; p < 0.05), more fractured ribs (mean 7 vs 4; p < 0.05), and more frequent pulmonary contusion (73 vs 42%), hemothorax (45 vs 20%), and in-hospital mortality (10 vs 2%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Flail chest fracture patterns indicate more severe trauma and higher complication rates. Studies should report outcomes for flail and multiple simple rib fracture patterns separately when evaluating rib fracture treatments.