Microsurgery · 2020
Bipedicled dorsal intercostal artery propeller flaps for reconstruction of extensive cervicothoracic midline defects.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Schmidt Magali, Cristofari Sarra, Al Madani Omar, Romano Golda, Qassemyar Quentin, Pascal-Moussellard Hugues, Atlan Michael
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Propeller flaps have been reported to cover cervicothoracic midline defects with lower donor site morbidity compared to muscle flaps. When these defects are extensive, we propose a propeller flap technique that we have named dorsal intercostal artery perforator plus (DICAP+) flap based on two perforator pedicles, to secure the large skin paddle. In this article, we present our experience.
METHODS: Six propeller DICAP+ flap procedures were performed on five patients, to reconstruct cervicothoracic midline defects. Three of them were caused by tumors and two were secondary to hardware exposure after spinal surgery. Defect sizes ranged from 16 × 5 to 24 × 9 cm. Every propeller flap was harvested on two perforators including one DICAP, and rotated from 80° to 180°.
RESULTS: Skin ellipse size ranged from 15 × 7 cm or 82.4 cm2 to 25 × 12 cm or 235.5 cm2 , equal to a mean surface area of 160 cm2 . The donor site was closed by primary suturing in four of the six procedures, by a contralateral propeller DICAP flap in one patient, and was left to heal by secondary intention in another one. All six flaps successfully covered the underlying defects with no evidence of partial or complete necrosis. No other complications were observed at recipient and donor sites. The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Propeller flaps based on two dorsal perforators including one dorsal intercostal artery perforator, DICAP+, are a reliable means of reconstructing extensive cervicothoracic midline defects.
METHODS: Six propeller DICAP+ flap procedures were performed on five patients, to reconstruct cervicothoracic midline defects. Three of them were caused by tumors and two were secondary to hardware exposure after spinal surgery. Defect sizes ranged from 16 × 5 to 24 × 9 cm. Every propeller flap was harvested on two perforators including one DICAP, and rotated from 80° to 180°.
RESULTS: Skin ellipse size ranged from 15 × 7 cm or 82.4 cm2 to 25 × 12 cm or 235.5 cm2 , equal to a mean surface area of 160 cm2 . The donor site was closed by primary suturing in four of the six procedures, by a contralateral propeller DICAP flap in one patient, and was left to heal by secondary intention in another one. All six flaps successfully covered the underlying defects with no evidence of partial or complete necrosis. No other complications were observed at recipient and donor sites. The follow-up period ranged from 9 months to 2 years.
CONCLUSIONS: Propeller flaps based on two dorsal perforators including one dorsal intercostal artery perforator, DICAP+, are a reliable means of reconstructing extensive cervicothoracic midline defects.