Surface prostatic metaplasia, transitional cell metaplasia and superficial clusters of small basophilic cells in the uterine cervix: prevalence in gender-affirming hysterectomies and comparison with benign hysterectomies from cisgender women.

AIMS: As gender-affirming surgery is becoming more common, it is important for pathologists to recognize potential benign findings to avoid misinterpretation. Cervical transitional cell metaplasia and superficial clusters of small basophilic cells have been described in the context of gender-affirming testosterone therapy; these findings may be misdiagnosed as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or endometrial cells on Pap smears. Prostatic metaplasia has been reported in the surface squamous epithelium of the vagina and the uterine cervix in individuals undergoing gender-affirming androgen therapy; this finding is often associated with NKX3.1-positive basal keratinocytes. The aim of this study was to assess the morphological and immunohistochemical features of the uterine cervix in gender-affirming hysterectomies in comparison with benign hysterectomies from cisgender women.

METHODS AND

RESULTS

We assessed the morphological and immunohistochemical features of the uterine cervix in 49 gender-affirming hysterectomies as compared with 57 hysterectomies from cisgender patients to establish the relative prevalences of surface prostatic metaplasia, NKX3.1-positive basal keratinocytes, transitional cell metaplasia, and small basophilic cells in the cervical squamous epithelium. The cervical tissue from the gender-affirming therapy cohort showed significantly higher prevalences of NKX3.1-positive basal keratinocytes (86% versus 1.8%), transitional cell metaplasia (80% versus 3.5%), superficial clusters of small basophilic cells (67% versus 7%), and surface prostatic metaplasia (43% versus 3.5%).

CONCLUSION

NKX3.1-positive basal keratinocytes, transitional cell metaplasia, small basophilic cells and surface prostatic metaplasia are all more prevalent in the cervices of individuals receiving gender-affirming testosterone therapy; awareness of this fact allows pathologists to avoid the overdiagnosis of dysplasia or the recommendation of unnecessary follow-up procedures.