Comparison of low-energy FLACS and conventional cataract surgery: meta-analysis and systematic review.

TOPIC: To systematically compare the effectiveness of conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) and low-energy femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in patients with cataract.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cataract surgery is a common procedure, and comparing different techniques such as CPS and low-energy FLACS is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.

METHODS

The PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched for clinical trials. Outcomes of procedure time, effective phacoemulsification time, balanced salt solution usage, cumulative dissipated energy, mean change of corrected distance visual acuity, endothelial cells reduction, central corneal thickness (CCT), and aqueous cytokine level were evaluated. The effect measures were weighted mean differences with 95% CI. The protocol was registered at the Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42023420173).

RESULTS

11 studies were included in this meta-analysis, of which 1680 eyes were analyzed (637 eyes in the low-energy FLACS group and 1043 eyes in the CPS group). Low-energy FLACS demonstrated significantly fewer reductions in endothelial cell count at 6 months ( P < .001) compared with CPS. It also exhibited a shorter effective phacoemulsification time ( P < .001) and less balanced salt solution usage ( P < .001). However, there were no differences in cumulative dissipated energy, corrected distance visual acuity, CCT changes, or aqueous cytokine levels between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both low-energy FLACS and CPS are effective in treating cataracts, but low-energy FLACS may offer advantages such as reduced phacoemulsification time and less endothelial cell loss.