MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181e07dd9

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of trauma · 2010

Optimal thoracic and lumbar spine imaging for trauma: are thoracic and lumbar spine reformats always indicated?

Mancini D Joshua, Burchard Kenneth W, Pekala Joseph S

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) of the thoracic and lumbar (T/L) spine with reformats has become the imaging modality of choice for the identification of T/L spine fractures. The objective of this study was to directly compare chest/abdomen/pelvis CT (CAP CT) with CT with T/L reformats (T/L CT) for the identification of T/L spine fractures.

METHODS

Patients who had both a CAP CT scan (5-mm imaging spacing) and T/L CT reconstruction (2.5-mm image spacing with sagittal and coronal reformats) were selected. A "fracture" group (N = 35) and a "no fracture" group (N = 57) were identified. The type and level of fracture were recorded.

RESULTS

The CAP CT correctly identified all 35 patients with a thoracolumbar fracture (100% sensitivity; 95% confidence interval: 88-100%). A total of 80 separate fracture sites were present in the 35 patients. The CAP CT accurately identified 78 of those fractures (97.5% sensitivity; 95% confidence interval: 90.4-99.6%). The two fractures not identified on the CAP CT were both the transverse process fractures in patients with multiple fractures at different levels.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have a CAP CT do not require reformats for clearance of the T/L spine.

Для цитирования: Mancini D Joshua, Burchard Kenneth W, Pekala Joseph S. Optimal thoracic and lumbar spine imaging for trauma: are thoracic and lumbar spine reformats always indicated?. The Journal of trauma. 2010. DOI: 10.1097/ta.0b013e3181e07dd9.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.