International urology and nephrology · 2022
Technique, outcome and changes in prostate dimensions in patients with urinary retention managed by aquablation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yee Chi-Hang, Tang Sui-Fan, Yuen Steffi Kar-Kei, Chan Chi-Kwok, Teoh Jeremy Y C, Chiu Peter K F, Ng Chi-Fai
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the functional and urodynamic outcome of Aquablation in patients with acute urinary retention (AUR) on catheters.
METHODS: Men aged 50-70 who failed medical treatment of BPO with AUR failing to wean off urethral catheter were recruited to undergo Aquablation. Individuals were assessed pre-operatively and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was defined by the success rate of weaning off catheter. Secondary outcomes were measured by a change in prostate size, symptom scores and urodynamic parameters.
RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent Aquablation between June 2019 and September 2020. Mean duration of the urethral catheter in-situ was 5.9 ± 4.9 weeks and mean prostate size of the cohort pre-operatively was 60.8 ± 15.8 cc. A second pass Aqaublation treatment was performed in 14 patients. Five patients failed to wean off the catheter on the first attempt after surgery, requiring another attempt 1 week later which were all successful. At 3 months after the operation, a significant reduction in prostate volume was observed (60.8 ± 15.8 cc vs 24.9 ± 10.3 cc, p < 0.001). No change in international index of erectile function (IIEF) was found (baseline: 16.1 ± 5.8; 3-month: 14.9 ± 6.4; p = 0.953). Mean bladder outlet obstruction index was 14.2 ± 23.0 at 6 months upon urodynamic assessment with 75% of patients had a resolution of detrusor overactivity. Reduction in prostate length was found to be more significant than a reduction in width and height after Aquablation (R = 0.693, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: From the early data of a single centre, Aquablation was shown to provide a consistent improvement in symptoms, uroflowmetry and urodynamic parameters in patient with a urethral catheter. Results from our study suggest that improvement from Aquablation is reproducible in patients with AUR.
METHODS: Men aged 50-70 who failed medical treatment of BPO with AUR failing to wean off urethral catheter were recruited to undergo Aquablation. Individuals were assessed pre-operatively and at 3 and 6 months after surgery. The primary outcome was defined by the success rate of weaning off catheter. Secondary outcomes were measured by a change in prostate size, symptom scores and urodynamic parameters.
RESULTS: Twenty patients underwent Aquablation between June 2019 and September 2020. Mean duration of the urethral catheter in-situ was 5.9 ± 4.9 weeks and mean prostate size of the cohort pre-operatively was 60.8 ± 15.8 cc. A second pass Aqaublation treatment was performed in 14 patients. Five patients failed to wean off the catheter on the first attempt after surgery, requiring another attempt 1 week later which were all successful. At 3 months after the operation, a significant reduction in prostate volume was observed (60.8 ± 15.8 cc vs 24.9 ± 10.3 cc, p < 0.001). No change in international index of erectile function (IIEF) was found (baseline: 16.1 ± 5.8; 3-month: 14.9 ± 6.4; p = 0.953). Mean bladder outlet obstruction index was 14.2 ± 23.0 at 6 months upon urodynamic assessment with 75% of patients had a resolution of detrusor overactivity. Reduction in prostate length was found to be more significant than a reduction in width and height after Aquablation (R = 0.693, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: From the early data of a single centre, Aquablation was shown to provide a consistent improvement in symptoms, uroflowmetry and urodynamic parameters in patient with a urethral catheter. Results from our study suggest that improvement from Aquablation is reproducible in patients with AUR.