Actas urologicas espanolas · 2017
Management of iatrogenic cystoscopic urethral lesion associated with sequela of cuff erosion in a patient after previous AMS 800 implantation. One-step technique with revision, without cuff explantation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Weibl P, Rutkowski M, Huebner W
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Iatrogenic urethral lesion with subsequent cuff erosion during cystoscopy is a rare complication. The alternative surgical strategy with in situ urethroplasty while maintaining the open cuff left in situ will be presented.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors report 3cases of iatrogenic urethral lesion with cuff erosion during cystoscopic evaluation to exclude stricture or cuff erosion due to new onset of obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. All patients had a history of a AMS 800 implantation due to posprostatectomy incontinence. Rigid cystoscopy was performed, which revelaed no pathologies; however, iatrogenic small urethral lesion was identified during the removal of the cystoscope at the projection of the cuff.
RESULTS: In situ urethroplasty was performed, and the cuff was left open in situ. Additionally a protection fat flap was placed around the urethra from the dorsolateral aspect, separating the cuff and urethra from the direct contact with each other. After 6 weeks the urethral defect was completely healed and via a primary perineal incision the cuff was readapted and closed. The device was fully functioning without any additional adjustments.
CONCLUSION: Our modification should be considered in select cases with absence of infection as part of management strategy for cases of iatrogenic urethral lesions with subsequent cuff erosion. Thereby the original cuff can be spared and the possibly difficult preparation of the urethra during reoperation can be avoided. However, additional more cases should be presented in the world-wide literature, to confirm the utility of this surgical principle.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors report 3cases of iatrogenic urethral lesion with cuff erosion during cystoscopic evaluation to exclude stricture or cuff erosion due to new onset of obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms. All patients had a history of a AMS 800 implantation due to posprostatectomy incontinence. Rigid cystoscopy was performed, which revelaed no pathologies; however, iatrogenic small urethral lesion was identified during the removal of the cystoscope at the projection of the cuff.
RESULTS: In situ urethroplasty was performed, and the cuff was left open in situ. Additionally a protection fat flap was placed around the urethra from the dorsolateral aspect, separating the cuff and urethra from the direct contact with each other. After 6 weeks the urethral defect was completely healed and via a primary perineal incision the cuff was readapted and closed. The device was fully functioning without any additional adjustments.
CONCLUSION: Our modification should be considered in select cases with absence of infection as part of management strategy for cases of iatrogenic urethral lesions with subsequent cuff erosion. Thereby the original cuff can be spared and the possibly difficult preparation of the urethra during reoperation can be avoided. However, additional more cases should be presented in the world-wide literature, to confirm the utility of this surgical principle.