European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025
Predicting multiple organ failure after major orthopedic interventions is possible using only conventional laboratory tests.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Briggs Gabrielle D, Gelzinnis Scott, Lott Natalie J, Tuboly Eszter, Coulthard James T, Nolan Erin K, Oldmeadow Christopher J, De Malmanche Theo, Balogh Zsolt J
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The decision to delay secondary, non-life-saving orthopedic surgery to reduce the risk of multiple organ failure (MOF) or sepsis is largely based on expert opinion. A decision-making tool may solve this problem by pre-operatively reflecting the patient's inflammatory/coagulation status. We aimed to determine whether the combination of readily available measures of inflammation and coagulation could predict MOF/sepsis in polytrauma patients.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center study of adult trauma patients requiring pelvic/acetabular surgery. Patients were recruited from October 2011-January 2018. The primary outcome was postoperative MOF and sepsis. Full blood count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, complement C3 and C4, C-reactive protein, tryptase, cortisol, and interleukin-6 were collected preoperatively and 30 min, 1 day, and 3 days postoperatively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to cluster the data within and across time. Logistic regression was used to predict MOF or sepsis using the top 4 principal components.
RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were recruited. The incidence of MOF and sepsis was 7% and 13%, respectively. PCA of preoperatively-collected immune and coagulation markers predicted MOF (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.94). Using routine tests alone predicted MOF with an AUC of 0.94. Sepsis was predictable with less accuracy than MOF from PCA (preoperative-AUC: 0.76).
CONCLUSION: The routine clinical data available prior to non-life-saving definitive pelvic/acetabular surgery could predict MOF, and may serve as a tool for orthopedic surgeons to optimise the timing of surgery. Multi-centre, prospective investigation is required for validation.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center study of adult trauma patients requiring pelvic/acetabular surgery. Patients were recruited from October 2011-January 2018. The primary outcome was postoperative MOF and sepsis. Full blood count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, international normalized ratio, fibrinogen, complement C3 and C4, C-reactive protein, tryptase, cortisol, and interleukin-6 were collected preoperatively and 30 min, 1 day, and 3 days postoperatively. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to cluster the data within and across time. Logistic regression was used to predict MOF or sepsis using the top 4 principal components.
RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were recruited. The incidence of MOF and sepsis was 7% and 13%, respectively. PCA of preoperatively-collected immune and coagulation markers predicted MOF (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.94). Using routine tests alone predicted MOF with an AUC of 0.94. Sepsis was predictable with less accuracy than MOF from PCA (preoperative-AUC: 0.76).
CONCLUSION: The routine clinical data available prior to non-life-saving definitive pelvic/acetabular surgery could predict MOF, and may serve as a tool for orthopedic surgeons to optimise the timing of surgery. Multi-centre, prospective investigation is required for validation.