m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Kardiologia polska · 2026

Immediate versus staged complete revascularization using drug-eluting stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease: An updated meta-analysis after the OPTION-STEMI trial.

СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Di Pietro Gianluca, Improta Riccardo, De Filippo Ovidio, Scarparo Paola, Colantonio Riccardo, Tomai Fabrizio, Sardella Gennaro, Diletti Roberto, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Mancone Massimo

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Complete revascularization is recommended for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary artery disease. However, the optimal timing of non-culprit lesion percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains controversial, ranging from treatment during the initial procedure to several weeks after the acute event.

AIMS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, and EMBASE through September 2025 for randomized controlled trials comparing immediate vs. staged complete revascularization with drug-eluting stents in patients presenting with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing primary PCI.

METHODS: The primary endpoint was death from cardiac causes at a median follow-up of 12 months. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality, recurrent non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), any unplanned revascularization, target-vessel revascularization, target-lesion revascularization, major bleeding, acute kidney injury, and stroke.

RESULTS: Six randomized controlled trials including 2837 patients (1441 immediate and 1446 staged) were analyzed. At 12 months, death from cardiac cause occurred at comparable rates between strategies (risk ratio [RR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.01; P = 0.33). No significant differences were observed for all-cause mortality (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00; P = 0.13), non-fatal MI (RR. 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.04; P = 0.17), target vessel revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.98-1.01; P = 0.48), or target lesion revascularization (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.02; P = 0.34). Similarly, no differences were found for stroke (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.01; P = 0.75), major bleeding (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.21), or AKI (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.99-1.03; P = 0.79). Immediate complete revascularization may be associated with a trend towards lower rates of unplanned revascularization compared with staged PCI (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.93-1.01; P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary disease, an immediate complete revascularization strategy showed comparable rates of death from cardiac cause and non-fatal MI as compared with staged complete revascularization at a median of 12 months of follow-up.

Предметные рубрики MeSH