Annals of vascular surgery · 2026
Contemporary Results of Open Surgery for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sfyroeras Georgios S, Pitros Christos, Plakas Georgios, Yfantis Aristotelis, Antonopoulos Constantinos N, Moulakakis Konstantinos G, Lazaris Andreas M, Kakisis John D
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite the enduring importance of open surgical repair for complex aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD), advanced ischemia, or cases with failed endovascular therapy, there remains a notable gap in the current literature regarding contemporary outcomes of open surgery for AIOD. This study retrospectively analyzed 6 years of open revascularization procedures at our institution to evaluate perioperative outcomes, complications, and the influence of disease severity and procedure type.
METHOD: A total of 60 patients (mean age 64.8 years; predominantly male) underwent open AIOD repair, with most classified as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus D lesions. Most of them (72%) presented with advanced ischemia classified as Rutherford categories 4, 5, or 6. The majority received aortobifemoral bypass (n = 39), while others underwent axillobifemoral (n = 8), axillofemoral (n = 6), or iliofemoral (n = 8) bypass procedures.
RESULTS: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 20% of patients, primarily following aortobifemoral bypass (28%). Postoperative AKI was associated with significantly lower preoperative renal function. Dialysis and major cardiovascular events each affected 3.3% of the cohort. Fourteen percent required amputation, predominantly among those with higher Rutherford classifications (up to 67% in stage 6). The mean hospital length of stay was 21.5 days;intensive care unit admission was necessary in 44% of cases (mean duration 1.8 days). Thirty-day mortality was 1.7%. Aortobifemoral bypasses were more frequently performed in younger, patients and were associated with increased complication rates. In contrast, axillobifemoral and axillofemoral bypasses, performed in older and high-risk populations, were linked to fewer complications. Iliofemoral bypasses were associated with the longest hospital stays but minimal complications. Statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences among the groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: At our center, open surgical management of AIOD yielded low perioperative mortality and acceptable morbidity rates. AKI was frequent, particularly in patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass and those with less advanced ischemia. Amputation rates and hospital stays increased with greater disease severity. Both the revascularization technique and Rutherford classification significantly impacted perioperative outcomes.
METHOD: A total of 60 patients (mean age 64.8 years; predominantly male) underwent open AIOD repair, with most classified as TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus D lesions. Most of them (72%) presented with advanced ischemia classified as Rutherford categories 4, 5, or 6. The majority received aortobifemoral bypass (n = 39), while others underwent axillobifemoral (n = 8), axillofemoral (n = 6), or iliofemoral (n = 8) bypass procedures.
RESULTS: Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in 20% of patients, primarily following aortobifemoral bypass (28%). Postoperative AKI was associated with significantly lower preoperative renal function. Dialysis and major cardiovascular events each affected 3.3% of the cohort. Fourteen percent required amputation, predominantly among those with higher Rutherford classifications (up to 67% in stage 6). The mean hospital length of stay was 21.5 days;intensive care unit admission was necessary in 44% of cases (mean duration 1.8 days). Thirty-day mortality was 1.7%. Aortobifemoral bypasses were more frequently performed in younger, patients and were associated with increased complication rates. In contrast, axillobifemoral and axillofemoral bypasses, performed in older and high-risk populations, were linked to fewer complications. Iliofemoral bypasses were associated with the longest hospital stays but minimal complications. Statistical analysis demonstrated significant differences among the groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: At our center, open surgical management of AIOD yielded low perioperative mortality and acceptable morbidity rates. AKI was frequent, particularly in patients undergoing aortobifemoral bypass and those with less advanced ischemia. Amputation rates and hospital stays increased with greater disease severity. Both the revascularization technique and Rutherford classification significantly impacted perioperative outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansIliac ArteryRetrospective StudiesFemaleArterial Occlusive DiseasesMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeAortic DiseasesMaleAgedTime FactorsRisk FactorsAmputation, SurgicalSeverity of Illness IndexLimb SalvageAcute Kidney InjuryAged, 80 and overVascular Surgical ProceduresBlood Vessel Prosthesis ImplantationLength of Stay