MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.9738/intsurg-d-14-00018.1

Медицинская библиотека · International surgery · 2015

Successful salvage of the upper limb after crush injury requiring nine operations: a case report.

Zeng Qingmin, Cai Guoping, Liu Dechang, Wang Kun, Zhang Xinchao

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Emergency treatment of amputation is one of the most frequently used therapeutic methods for patients with severe upper limb crush injury with a mangled extremity severity score (MESS) of more than 7. With the development of advanced surgical repair techniques and reconstructive technology, cases that once required amputation can now be salvaged with appropriate management, and some limb functions may also be reserved. A patient with a severe upper limb crush injury with a MESS score of 10 was treated in our hospital. The limb was salvaged after 9 surgeries over 10 months. The follow-up visits over the next 18 months post-injury showed that the shoulder joint functions were rated as "excellent" (90) according to the Neer score, the Harris hip evaluation (HHS) for elbow joint functions was "good" (80), and the patient was very satisfied with the overall therapeutic outcome. We conclude from the successful outcome of this extreme injury that salvage attempts should be the first management choice for upper limbs with complex injuries to save as much function as possible. Amputation should only be adopted when the injury is life-threatening or no more function can be saved. The level of evidence was V.

Для цитирования: Zeng Qingmin, Cai Guoping, Liu Dechang, Wang Kun, Zhang Xinchao. Successful salvage of the upper limb after crush injury requiring nine operations: a case report.. International surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.9738/intsurg-d-14-00018.1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.