International urogynecology journal · 2011
The UK national prolapse survey: 5 years on.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jha Swati, Moran Paul
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this study was to assess trends in the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) amongst UK practitioners and the changes in management since this survey was first conducted 5 years ago.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to practising consultant gynaecologists in UK hospitals. They included urogynaecologists in tertiary centres, gynaecologists with a designated special interest in urogynaecology, and general gynaecologists. The questionnaire included case scenarios encompassing contentious issues in the surgical management of POP and was a revised version of the questionnaire sent 5 years ago.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen responses were received of which 190 were completed. For anterior vaginal wall prolapse, anterior colporrhaphy was still the procedure of choice in 71% of respondents. There was a significant rise in graft usage, particularly synthetic graft for recurrent prolapse (56%). A Burch was being performed by only 1% compared to 11% 5 years ago. In women with uterovaginal prolapse, the procedure of choice was still a vaginal hysterectomy and repair (82%). Thirty-five percent of respondents would operate in women whose family was incomplete. In women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse, the procedure of choice was posterior colporrhaphy with midline fascial plication in 66%, marginally less than the previous (75%). For vault prolapse, 73% of respondents would operate, and 43% would perform urodynamics prior to surgery. The procedure of choice was an abdominal sacrocolpopexy (44%), slightly greater than 5 years ago when it was 38%.
CONCLUSIONS: Basic trends in prolapse surgery remain unchanged. The increase in the use of grafts is in patients with recurrent prolapse.
METHODS: A postal questionnaire survey was sent to practising consultant gynaecologists in UK hospitals. They included urogynaecologists in tertiary centres, gynaecologists with a designated special interest in urogynaecology, and general gynaecologists. The questionnaire included case scenarios encompassing contentious issues in the surgical management of POP and was a revised version of the questionnaire sent 5 years ago.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighteen responses were received of which 190 were completed. For anterior vaginal wall prolapse, anterior colporrhaphy was still the procedure of choice in 71% of respondents. There was a significant rise in graft usage, particularly synthetic graft for recurrent prolapse (56%). A Burch was being performed by only 1% compared to 11% 5 years ago. In women with uterovaginal prolapse, the procedure of choice was still a vaginal hysterectomy and repair (82%). Thirty-five percent of respondents would operate in women whose family was incomplete. In women with posterior vaginal wall prolapse, the procedure of choice was posterior colporrhaphy with midline fascial plication in 66%, marginally less than the previous (75%). For vault prolapse, 73% of respondents would operate, and 43% would perform urodynamics prior to surgery. The procedure of choice was an abdominal sacrocolpopexy (44%), slightly greater than 5 years ago when it was 38%.
CONCLUSIONS: Basic trends in prolapse surgery remain unchanged. The increase in the use of grafts is in patients with recurrent prolapse.