MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0310057x9602400114

Медицинская библиотека · Anaesthesia and intensive care · 1996

Attitudes and practices of New Zealand anaesthetists with regard to epidural and subarachnoid anaesthesia.

Rodgers A, Sage D, Futter M, MacMahon S

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

A survey was conducted among 259 New Zealand specialist anaesthetists to assess attitudes and practices with regard to epidural or subarachnoid anaesthesia (ESA). Ninety-four per cent replied and virtually all of the respondents indicated that they performed ESA at some time. ESA was used by most anaesthetists for most patients undergoing major hip or knee surgery, abdomino-perineal resection, cystectomy, caesarean section or transurethral resection of the prostate, ESA was used is about half of patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, femoro-popliteal bypass or thoracotomy and there was marked variation between anaesthetists in the frequency of using ESA for these procedures. There was broad consensus about the importance of a number of factors that might influence the decision to employ ESA; in particular that systemic sepsis and prolonged bleeding time were important contraindications and that patient preference and chronic lung disease were important indications. However respondents were equally divided as to whether they felt that recent myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure constituted indications or contraindications to ESA.

Для цитирования: Rodgers A, Sage D, Futter M, MacMahon S. Attitudes and practices of New Zealand anaesthetists with regard to epidural and subarachnoid anaesthesia.. Anaesthesia and intensive care. 1996. DOI: 10.1177/0310057x9602400114.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.