MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.26355/eurrev_202404_36018

Медицинская библиотека · European review for medical and pharmacological sciences · 2024

The significance of cervical discopathy diagnosis in patients with mastalgia.

Kartal B, Sahiner I T, Turhan V B, Alkurt E G

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to explore the involvement of cervical discopathy in the development of non-cyclic mastalgia by employing cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

A total of 407 patients were included in the study. Individualized management plans were developed for each patient. Pathological findings in MRI results were assessed by specialists in physical therapy and neurosurgery, and appropriate treatment was administered. Visual assessments of patients were conducted. The Analog Scale (VAS) scoring system was used at the initial presentation, and patients were evaluated at 1 and 3 months following the treatment.

RESULTS

In the MRI examinations of the patients included in the study, simultaneous cervical disc protrusion was observed in 29% (n: 124) of those with annular bulging. Comparing the VAS scores of patients before treatment, at the 1st and at the 3rd month showed a significant decrease in mastalgia pain (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of cervical discopathy holds significant importance in the treatment of mastalgia patients. Therefore, clinicians should keep the cervical spine in mind as a potential contributing factor to mastalgia.

Для цитирования: Kartal B, Sahiner I T, Turhan V B, Alkurt E G. The significance of cervical discopathy diagnosis in patients with mastalgia.. European review for medical and pharmacological sciences. 2024. DOI: 10.26355/eurrev_202404_36018.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.