Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine · 2026
Trabecular titanium metaglene is associated with improved clinical outcomes in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Petruccelli Rosario, Pucci Emanuele, Cenci Giulia, Porcellini Camilla, Ceccarini Paolo, Caraffa Auro, Di Giacomo Lorenzo Maria
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: There is currently conflicting evidence regarding the effectiveness of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Trabecular titanium (TT) is a highly porous biomaterial increasingly adopted in joint arthroplasty, particularly in cases with poor bone stock and compromised bone quality. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of TT and the clinical and radiological outcomes in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures using RSA as the first choice in elderly patients. We evaluated the differences and advantages of outcomes in the use of TT metaglene compared with standard implants.
METHODS: Our study is a retrospective observational comparative analysis of clinical and radiographic short-term results. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty using either a TT metaglene or a standard implant was performed according to international guidelines. Patients were clinically evaluated for range of motion and strength of the shoulder; visual analog scale (VAS), Quick Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and Constant score were used. They were also assessed with radiographs for the presence of glenoid or humeral loosening and radiolucent lines. Data were collected and analyzed using Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test.
RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated for proximal humeral fractures with RSA. Thirty-two patients were included in clinical and radiographic follow-up. Mean follow-up is 30.8 months ± 5.8 months. At final clinical evaluation, in the overall cohort, the mean VAS score is 2.4 ± 2.1, the mean QuickDASH score is 22.6 ± 9.4, and the mean Constant Score is 48 ± 14.2. The mean abduction weight-bearing capacity is 1.9 ± 0.9 kg. Patients treated with TT demonstrated improved shoulder elevation, abduction, strength, and Constant score compared with standard implants. At radiographic evaluation, there were no cases of scapular notching or loosening; complete tuberosity healing and integration were achieved in 12 cases (37.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: TT metaglene has shown good results at short-term follow-up. No relevant major postoperative complications emerged; it may represent a valuable option for functional recovery in elderly patients and for patients with poor bone stock. The TT implant demonstrates superior clinical results compared with the standard implant.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
METHODS: Our study is a retrospective observational comparative analysis of clinical and radiographic short-term results. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty using either a TT metaglene or a standard implant was performed according to international guidelines. Patients were clinically evaluated for range of motion and strength of the shoulder; visual analog scale (VAS), Quick Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) score, and Constant score were used. They were also assessed with radiographs for the presence of glenoid or humeral loosening and radiolucent lines. Data were collected and analyzed using Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-square test.
RESULTS: Forty-seven consecutive patients were treated for proximal humeral fractures with RSA. Thirty-two patients were included in clinical and radiographic follow-up. Mean follow-up is 30.8 months ± 5.8 months. At final clinical evaluation, in the overall cohort, the mean VAS score is 2.4 ± 2.1, the mean QuickDASH score is 22.6 ± 9.4, and the mean Constant Score is 48 ± 14.2. The mean abduction weight-bearing capacity is 1.9 ± 0.9 kg. Patients treated with TT demonstrated improved shoulder elevation, abduction, strength, and Constant score compared with standard implants. At radiographic evaluation, there were no cases of scapular notching or loosening; complete tuberosity healing and integration were achieved in 12 cases (37.5%).
CONCLUSIONS: TT metaglene has shown good results at short-term follow-up. No relevant major postoperative complications emerged; it may represent a valuable option for functional recovery in elderly patients and for patients with poor bone stock. The TT implant demonstrates superior clinical results compared with the standard implant.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.