Identification of Degenerated Murine Facial Nerves With Fluorescence Labeling After Transection Injury.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Delayed peripheral nerve repair is complicated by nerve degeneration and atrophy that can prevent identification. We use a murine facial nerve transection model to demonstrate the efficacy of ALM-488 (bevonescein) in labeling degenerated facial nerves with quantitative image analysis and qualitative survey data.
STUDY
DESIGN
Prospective cohort study.
SETTING
Laboratory.
METHODS
Ten wild-type mice underwent transection of the lower facial nerve division with subsequent degeneration. Either 9 (n = 5 mice) or 12 (n = 5 mice) weeks later, mice underwent intravenous infusion of ALM-488 with in vivo real-time fluorescence imaging (FL) of the facial nerve. Using ImageJ, the mean gray value of each nerve segment under white light reflectance (WLR) and FL was compared to that of adjacent soft tissue to calculate the signal-to-background ratio (SBR). A survey was distributed to evaluate the perceived utility of ALM-488 in surgeon identification of degenerated nerves.
RESULTS
The mean SBR of degenerated nerves was 1.08 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.07) under WLR and 2.11 (SD: 0.31) under FL (p < 0.001). In mice with degenerated nerves, survey participants identified on average 3.01 (SD: 1.84) nerve branches under WLR and 5.73 (SD: 1.88) under FL (p < 0.0001). Under FL, 47 of 48 survey responses correctly identified isolated, degenerated nerves; in contrast, only 12 responses identified degenerated nerves under WLR (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION
Preoperative intravenous infusion of ALM-488 with FL improves the identification of degenerated facial nerves. ALM-488 also improves surgeon confidence in nerve identification, particularly in degenerated nerve branches that are not visible with WLR.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.