BJU international · 2015
Retrograde ureteric stent insertion in the management of infected obstructed kidneys.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Flukes Stephanie, Hayne Dickon, Kuan Melvyn, Wallace Michael, McMillan Kevin, Rukin Nicholas J
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the outcomes of retrograde ureteric stenting in the setting of infected hydronephrosis secondary to ureteric calculi.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of all patients over a 15-month period admitted with infected obstructed kidneys secondary to ureteric calculi. Inclusion criteria were based on clinical evidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and radiological evidence of obstructing ureteric calculi. Outcome measures included success of procedure, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), length of hospital stay, morbidity, and all-cause mortality during hospital admission.
RESULTS: In all, 52 patients were included. Success of retrograde ureteric stenting was 98%. In all, 17% of patients required an ICU admission, with a post ureteric instrumentation ICU admissions rate of 6%. The mean white cell count and serum creatinine improved significantly after the procedure. Major complication rate included septic shock 6%, but there were no episodes of major haemorrhage and no deaths.
CONCLUSION: Retrograde ureteric stenting is safe and effective in infected obstructed kidneys with results comparable to percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion. Post instrumentation ICU admissions occur in 6% of retrograde stentings.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of all patients over a 15-month period admitted with infected obstructed kidneys secondary to ureteric calculi. Inclusion criteria were based on clinical evidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and radiological evidence of obstructing ureteric calculi. Outcome measures included success of procedure, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), length of hospital stay, morbidity, and all-cause mortality during hospital admission.
RESULTS: In all, 52 patients were included. Success of retrograde ureteric stenting was 98%. In all, 17% of patients required an ICU admission, with a post ureteric instrumentation ICU admissions rate of 6%. The mean white cell count and serum creatinine improved significantly after the procedure. Major complication rate included septic shock 6%, but there were no episodes of major haemorrhage and no deaths.
CONCLUSION: Retrograde ureteric stenting is safe and effective in infected obstructed kidneys with results comparable to percutaneous nephrostomy tube insertion. Post instrumentation ICU admissions occur in 6% of retrograde stentings.