MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00464-019-07013-4

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical endoscopy · 2019

Laparoscopy versus conventional laparotomy in the management of abdominal trauma: a multi-institutional matched-pair study.

Gao Yunhe, Li Shaoqing, Xi Hongqing, Bian Shibo, Zhang Kecheng, Cui Jianxin, Li Jiyang, Liu Feide, Liu Yi, Lu Yixun, Wang Baohua, Qiao Zhi, Chen Lin

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy is being increasingly applied as either a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention in the management of abdominal trauma. However, its outcomes in comparison with conventional laparotomy remain unclear, especially in terms of therapeutic management.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients from three trauma centers in Beijing, China. Fifty-four patients undergoing laparoscopic interventions for abdominal trauma by experienced laparoscopists were enrolled in the laparoscopy group (LP group). Another 54 patients who underwent laparotomy (LT group) were matched according to the patients' baseline characteristics, causes of injury, and hemodynamic parameters. Perioperative clinical parameters and short-term survival were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristics were comparable between these two groups (LP vs. LT: Age, p = 0.112; Sex, p = 0.820; Injury severity score, p = 0.158; Cause distribution, p = 0.840). The most common cause was traffic accident (36.1%) and the most frequent surgical intervention was bowel repair/resection (34.3%) in our study. The operation time was similar in these two groups (LP vs. LT: 202.2 ± 72.58 vs. 194.11 ± 82.95 min, p = 0.295) while post-operative complication rate was slightly reduced in LP group (7.7% vs. 13.5%) with no statistical significance (p = 0.383). Opioid use was lower in the LP than LT group (11.67 ± 4.08 vs. 26.0 ± 13.42 morphine equivalents (MEQ), p = 0.034). The hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LP group (13.48 ± 10.9 vs. 18.64 ± 14.73 days, p = 0.021). One patient in the LT group died of an intra-abdominal abscess and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome 19 days postoperatively, while all patients in the LP group recovered and were discharged.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopy is feasible and safe in treating abdominal trauma patients in hemodynamically stable conditions performed by experienced surgeons. Laparoscopy might have the advantages of reduced pain and quicker recovery with similarly favorable clinical outcomes.

Для цитирования: Gao Yunhe, Li Shaoqing, Xi Hongqing, Bian Shibo, Zhang Kecheng, Cui Jianxin, Li Jiyang, Liu Feide, Liu Yi, Lu Yixun, Wang Baohua, Qiao Zhi, Chen Lin. Laparoscopy versus conventional laparotomy in the management of abdominal trauma: a multi-institutional matched-pair study.. Surgical endoscopy. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07013-4.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.