MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/adc.2009.177584

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of disease in childhood · 2010

Management and outcome of vein of Galen malformation.

McSweeney N, Brew S, Bhate S, Cox T, Roebuck D J, Ganesan V

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience of treating children with vein of Galen aneurysmal malformation (VGM) in a single UK centre between 2003 and 2008.

METHOD: Retrospective review of case notes and neuroimaging.

RESULTS

33 children were seen (26 neonates, seven infants), of whom 28 underwent endovascular treatment. Four were not offered treatment as they had evidence of severe diffuse brain injury at presentation; treatment was deferred in another who subsequently died. Seven children died (two of whom had endovascular treatment). Of the survivors (all treated), 13 (39%) are neurodevelopmentally intact, seven (21%) have mild neurodevelopmental impairment and the remaining six (18%) have significant neurological impairment. The authors were not able to identify clinical or radiological parameters which strongly predicted outcome. Of note, two children with initially low Bicêtre scores were neurologically intact after successful embolisation.

CONCLUSION

The outlook for children with VGM is significantly better since the advent of endovascular treatment. Decisions about the appropriateness and timing of treatment should be taken by an experienced multidisciplinary team.

Для цитирования: McSweeney N, Brew S, Bhate S, Cox T, Roebuck D J, Ganesan V. Management and outcome of vein of Galen malformation.. Archives of disease in childhood. 2010. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2009.177584.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.