Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2002
Relationship between serum cystatin C and creatinine in kidney and liver transplant patients.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hermida Jesús, Romero Rafael, Tutor J Carlos
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The results obtained for serum cystatin C, which has been proposed as a novel marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), in kidney and liver transplant are still very limited. In our study, the relationship between serum cystatin C and creatinine in kidney and liver transplant patients was investigated.
METHODS: Serum cystatin C and creatinine concentrations were determined in 182 samples from 52 kidney transplant patients and 71 samples from 28 liver transplant patients at 1-9870 days post-transplantation time. Eighty-seven serum samples from 66 patients with different types of chronic kidney disease were also analysed.
RESULTS: The serum creatinine (r=-0.517, p<0.001) and cystatin C (r=-0.409, p<0.001) concentrations were negatively correlated with the post-transplantation time in the kidney transplant patients. In the liver transplant patients, the correlation between these variables is not statistically significant. The creatinine/cystatin C ratio in the liver transplant group is significantly lower than in the other group of patients (p<0.001). This ratio in the kidney transplant patients groups is significantly lower than in the kidney disease group (p<0.001). In the kidney transplant patients the creatinine/cystatin C ratio and the post-transplantation time were negatively correlated (r=-0.523, p<0.001); however, in the liver transplant patients the correlation between these variables was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In the groups of kidney disease and kidney transplant patients, as renal function decreases, there is an increase in the creatinine/cystatin C ratio. This may be due to the fact that, since creatinine is eliminated by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, as renal function is impaired, its serum concentration increases to a greater extent than that of cystatin C, which is only eliminated by glomerular filtration. In the liver transplant patients, the creatinine/cystatin C ratio is lower than in the other groups. This may be due to better preserved renal function, lower muscular mass and a reduced rate of creatine formation and creatinine production in some of these patients. The serum cystatin C would be a better GFR marker than the widely used creatinine in liver transplant patients.
METHODS: Serum cystatin C and creatinine concentrations were determined in 182 samples from 52 kidney transplant patients and 71 samples from 28 liver transplant patients at 1-9870 days post-transplantation time. Eighty-seven serum samples from 66 patients with different types of chronic kidney disease were also analysed.
RESULTS: The serum creatinine (r=-0.517, p<0.001) and cystatin C (r=-0.409, p<0.001) concentrations were negatively correlated with the post-transplantation time in the kidney transplant patients. In the liver transplant patients, the correlation between these variables is not statistically significant. The creatinine/cystatin C ratio in the liver transplant group is significantly lower than in the other group of patients (p<0.001). This ratio in the kidney transplant patients groups is significantly lower than in the kidney disease group (p<0.001). In the kidney transplant patients the creatinine/cystatin C ratio and the post-transplantation time were negatively correlated (r=-0.523, p<0.001); however, in the liver transplant patients the correlation between these variables was not significant.
CONCLUSIONS: In the groups of kidney disease and kidney transplant patients, as renal function decreases, there is an increase in the creatinine/cystatin C ratio. This may be due to the fact that, since creatinine is eliminated by glomerular filtration and tubular secretion, as renal function is impaired, its serum concentration increases to a greater extent than that of cystatin C, which is only eliminated by glomerular filtration. In the liver transplant patients, the creatinine/cystatin C ratio is lower than in the other groups. This may be due to better preserved renal function, lower muscular mass and a reduced rate of creatine formation and creatinine production in some of these patients. The serum cystatin C would be a better GFR marker than the widely used creatinine in liver transplant patients.