Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy · 2021
Hysteroscopic findings after laparoscopic and open myomectomy with or without uterine cavity breach: historical cohort study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Boudova Barbora, Hlinecka Kristyna, Lisa Zdenka, Richtarova Adela, Zizka Zdenek, Mara Michal
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate hysteroscopic findings after laparoscopic and laparotomic myomectomy with a focus on the presence of postoperative intrauterine adhesions in groups of patients with and without perioperative uterine cavity breach (UCB).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a historical cohort study. Our database was searched to identify patients with UCB during myomectomy and matched the same number of patients after myomectomy without UCB to create a control group. All relevant data were retrieved from our medical records. In both groups, the results of follow-up hysteroscopy were analyzed.
RESULTS: Low prevalence of intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy was observed in only 3.5% of the 170 patients in our samples. No significant difference in the occurrence of synechiae between the patients with and without UCB was found (2 vs. 4, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.7, p = .341), nor was the difference in other hysteroscopic findings. Follow-up hysteroscopy was performed with slender optics and expandable casing system without need of any anesthesia in 87.1% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, the prevalence of post-myomectomy intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy is low. Our study did not demonstrate that UCB during myomectomy is a risk factor for the formation of intrauterine synechiae.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a historical cohort study. Our database was searched to identify patients with UCB during myomectomy and matched the same number of patients after myomectomy without UCB to create a control group. All relevant data were retrieved from our medical records. In both groups, the results of follow-up hysteroscopy were analyzed.
RESULTS: Low prevalence of intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy was observed in only 3.5% of the 170 patients in our samples. No significant difference in the occurrence of synechiae between the patients with and without UCB was found (2 vs. 4, RR 0.5, 95% CI 0.1-2.7, p = .341), nor was the difference in other hysteroscopic findings. Follow-up hysteroscopy was performed with slender optics and expandable casing system without need of any anesthesia in 87.1% of cases.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our findings, the prevalence of post-myomectomy intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy is low. Our study did not demonstrate that UCB during myomectomy is a risk factor for the formation of intrauterine synechiae.